Adenovirus: Bewerkt adenovirus rechtstreeks ingebracht in tumorweefsel zorgt voor opmerkelijke resultaten
4 juni 2004: bron DOW en Yahoonews
Onderzoekers van Cancer Research UK aan de universiteit van Londen maken
melding van een succesvolle trial met het inbrengen van een genbewerkt virus
in kankercellen. Het zogenoemde adenovirus is dusdanig bewerkt dat het zich
razendsnel verspreid in de kankercellen zelf maar de gezonde cellen
ongemoeid laat omdat deze tijdig het virus herkennen en onschadelijk maken.
Kankercellen lukt het echter niet dit virus onschadelijk te maken en het
virus zorgt ervoor dat de kankercellen als het ware 'exploderen' zoals de
onderzoekers dat omschrijven. Hier twee persberichten over dit toch
wel opzienbarende nieuws.
Genetically-modified virus explodes cancer cells
By Shaoni Bhattacharya
A genetically-modified virus that exploits the selfish behaviour of cancer
cells may offer a powerful and selective way of killing tumours.
Deleting a key gene from the virus enabled it to infect and burst cancer
cells while leaving normal tissues unharmed, reveals a study by researchers
at Cancer Research UK and Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry,
University of London.
Viruses spread by infiltrating the cells of their host. Normally, the
detection of an intruder by a cell triggers a process called apoptosis,
which causes the cell to commit suicide and prevents the virus spreading
further. However, viruses can carry genes that allow them to slip past this
cell death process in normal cells, causing infection.
The UK researchers deleted one such gene in an adenovirus. This meant that
the virus was immediately detected by normal cells and was unable to spread.
But in cancer cells, which grow uncontrollably and ignore the cell death
process, the virus was able to thrive and spread rapidly. It then multiplied
so vigorously that it killed the cancer cells by making them explode.
"The great thing about this strategy is that the cancer cell does all the
hard work," says Nick Lemoine, director of the Cancer Research UK Clinical
Centre at Bart's Medical School, who led the team. "It makes more and more
virus to infect its neighbouring cancer cells. But if a normal cell is
infected, it commits suicide before it can make new virus and spread of the
virus is contained."
Unexpected benefit
The gene the team deleted from the adenovirus is called E1B-19kD. But, as
well as removing the cloak the viruses normally use to evade detection by
cells, it had another "unexpected" effect, says Lemoine.
This was enabling the viruses to replicate much faster than normal, which in
turn helped burst the cancer cells. Previous GM viruses have not shown this
effect.
The team examined the effects of the GM virus on pancreatic, lung, ovarian,
liver and colorectal cancers in the test tube, as well as on live
tumour-bearing mice. The team plans to test the GM virus in clinical trials
in people in 2005.
"In tests so far it has proven both potent and selective, although only
clinical trials will tell us whether the approach can be an effective
treatment in people, "comments Robert Souhami, Cancer Research UK's director
of clinical and external affairs.
Lemoine adds that the GM virus could also be armed with additional
anti-cancer weapons, in the form of genes producing toxic compounds. "The
fact that we have taken a gene out of the viral backbone means we could arm
the virus with something that deliberately kills cancer," he told New
Scientist .
Journal reference: Molecular Therapy (DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.03.017)
Ook het DOW journaal maakt melding van deze studiepublicaties:
-- =WSJ.COM/The Daily Scan: Genetically Altered Viruses --
By Mark Ingebretsen
Of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Researchers in the U.K. may have found one of the
closest things yet to a magic bullet in the battle against cancer.
By removing a genetic component from a virus, the scientists prompted "it to
infect and burst cancer cells while leaving normal tissues unharmed,"
according
to the New Scientist.
The modified virus is able to destroy cancer cells by taking advantage of
their so-called "selfish behavior." As a news release from the group, Cancer
Research UK, explained, the body's normal cells will self-destruct if
infected
with a virus, and this suicidal behavior helps to prevent the virus from
spreading. Cancer cells, by contrast, "refuse to stop for anything -
allowing
the virus to thrive." Thus, the selfish behavior on the part of the cancer
cells
- that is their abject refusal to self-destruct on cue - allows "the
(genetically modified) virus to replicate and spread through tumor tissue,"
the
release said.
The news from Britain follows a Dow Jones Newswires story that reported:
"New
cancer drugs that target tumors and leave healthy cells alone are changing
the
face of cancer treatment."
"Unlike traditional chemotherapy, which often debilitates patients with
severe
nausea, diarrhea or opportunistic infections, these targeted drugs attack
tumor
cells directly and with fewer side effects."
Alimta goedgekeurd door FDA voor niet-klein-cellige longkanker in plaats van taxol en taxotere na uitstekende studieresultaten met veel minder bijwerkingen dan traditionele chemokuren.
27 augustus 2004: Bron: DOW: De FDA heeft afgelopen week goedkeuring gegeven aan Alimta, een medicijn tegen niet-klein-cellige longkanker, dat in studies minimaal zelfde resultaten gaf als taxol maar met veel minder bijwerkingen. Opvallend is dat in dit korte persbericht ook aanvullend B12 en foliumzuur wordt aanbevolen voor verminderen van bijwerkingen bij de behandeling van Alimta , maar ook andere chemokuren. we zullen proberen wat meer studieresultaten van Alimta te pakken te krijgen en hier te plaatsen.
WASHINGTON (AP)--The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday approved a
cancer drug made by pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) to treat advanced
non-small cell lung cancer in patients who have undergone chemotherapy.
According to the American Cancer Society, non-small cell lung cancer is the
leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the nation. Eighty percent of 174,000
new lung cancer cases diagnosed each year are non-small cell lung cancer. By the
time most patients arrive for treatment, the cancer is widespread.
The drug, Alimta, in clinical trials was found to shrink tumors as effectively
as another cancer-fighting drug, Taxotere. But Alimta did so with fewer
troubling side effects, which include hair loss, tingling fingers and toes,
depressed blood count, and hospitalizations for subsequent infection.
"Lung cancer is a very devastating disease and the therapies can be hard on
patients," said Roy Herbst, chief of thoracic oncology at MD Anderson Cancer
Center. The Houston facility sees nearly 1,500 new lung cancer patients per year
and treated at least 20 in the Alimta versus Taxotere study.
One in 50 patients taking Alimta had side effects. That benefit came without
any lessening of the drug's effectiveness. That's significant as cancer care
moves toward more combination drug or sequential therapies, Herbst said.
"We can only do that if the drugs we give (patients) leave them in a state ...
where they're still strong. You can kill the cancer, but leave the patient
feeling well," he said.
The Alimta treatment, 500 mg every 21 days, costs patients $3,900 per month,
according to the company. The anti-cancer drug works by interfering with three
enzymes on which tumors depend.
"There's no question, the survival was comparable to the survival with the
best drugs we have," said Dr. Paul Bunn, director of the University of Colorado
Cancer Center and principal investigator for the clinical trial. "This drug is
as good as anything else we have. It does benefit patients."
Dr. Richard Gralla, president of the New York Lung Cancer Alliance, estimated
tens of thousands of lung-cancer patients per year would be eligible to take
Alimta.
The trial tested a simple way to reduce side effects: Taking Alimta in concert
with folate pills and B-12 injections.
"When you take those special B vitamins, it further reduces the side effects
of the chemotherapy," Gralla said.
BBBD-behandeling (Blood Brain Barrier Disruption) bij lymfomen (tumoren) van centrale zenuwstelsel succesvol en hoog significant aldus fase II studie gepubliceerd in Pubmed
BBBD-behandeling (Blood Brain Barrier Disruption) bij lymfomen (tumoren) van centrale zenuwstelsel succesvol en hoog significant aldus fase II studie gepublicerd in Pubmed
d.d. 28 april 2004: Bron Pubmed
De BBBD behandeling - Blood Brain Barrier Disruption - (Bloed-hersenblokkade onderbrekers behandeling noemen we het maar vrij vertaald)
De BBBD-behandeling doorbreekt de natuurlijk ingebouwde beschermende barriëre (BBBD) van de hersenen die is samengesteld uit een net van endothelial cellen, die als het ware de muren van het bloedvat in de hersenen vormen. Dit netwerk van cellen creërt een barrière die de toegang van diverse substanties/stoffen, met inbegrip van vele therapeutische middelen, blokkeert.
Door deze cellen met een geconcentreerde suikeroplossing tijdelijk te krimpen, wordt de blokkade tijdelijk geopend, daarmee toestaande dat de chemo de tumor in de hersenen bereikt. Vergeleken met standaardchemotherapie, verhoogt de BBBD-behandeling door de ophef van de blokkade de levering van de chemomedicijnen aan de tumor en het omringende gebied met tien tot het honderdvoudige (Neuwelt 1998). De producent claimt en staaft dat met klinische studies dat zij hoog significante resultaten hebben met deze manier van behandelen van hersentumoren maar ook succes hebben bij de behandeling van lymfomen van het centraal zenuwstelsel Voor
OPS-leden hebben we directe adresgegevens enz. beschikbaar van ziekenhuizen die met deze BBBD techniek werken.
Hier het abstract uit Pubmed van de resultaten van een BBBD-behandeling van lymfomen in het centrale zenuwstelsel:
(LD McAllister et al, Cognitive outcomes and long-term follow-up results after enhanced chemotherapy delivery for primary central nervous system lymphoma, Neurosurgery 46:51-61, 2000).
Cognitive outcomes and long-term follow-up results after enhanced chemotherapy delivery for primary central nervous system lymphoma.
McAllister LD, Doolittle ND, Guastadisegni PE, Kraemer DF, Lacy CA, Crossen JR, Neuwelt EA.
Department of Neurology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201, USA.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related primary central nervous system lymphomas have the potential to achieve durable complete responses without radiotherapy, with treatment using enhanced chemotherapy delivery with blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). Reported 5-year survival rates with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy were generally only 9 to 22% and were associated, in one study, with an overall 32% incidence of overt dementia and ataxia, which are dramatically increased among patients more than 60 years of age.
METHODS: At the Oregon Health Sciences University, 111 consecutive patients with non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related central nervous system lymphomas were prospectively treated with methotrexate-based, BBBD-enhanced chemotherapy and underwent formal neuropsychological evaluations. Of those, 74 patients had no systemic lymphoma and had received no prior irradiation; those 74 patients are described in this report.
RESULTS: The estimated 5-year survival rate for this group was 42%, and the median survival time was 40.7 months. Overall, 48 patients (65%) exhibited complete responses and 36 patients continued to exhibit complete responses after 1 year of BBBD-enhanced chemotherapy. Of those 36 patients, none demonstrated evidence of cognitive loss in neuropsychological tests and/or clinical examinations.
CONCLUSION: BBBD-enhanced chemotherapy delivery, without subsequent radiotherapy, resulted in favorable survival and cognitive outcomes for patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas who had not previously undergone irradiation. A cooperative multicenter study of intravenous chemotherapy without radiotherapy versus BBBD-enhanced chemotherapy would address the feasibility and necessity of performing a Phase III study for these rare central nervous system malignancies.
Bestraling met 70 GY 1x per dag bij niet-klein-cellige longkanker net zo effectief als chemo, aldus fase II studie met 63 patiënten.
2 september 2004: Bron Pubmed Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):460-8.
Een fase II studie wijst uit dat een dagelijkse bestraling met 70GY bij niet-klein-cellige longkanker met zo effectief en met minder bijwerkingen op korte termijn is dan de chemokuren paclitaxel en topotecan en carboplatin en etoposide. we schrijven hier nadrukkelijk op korte termijn want de effecten van bestraling komen vaak pas jaren later aan de oppervlakte door o.a. hogere kans op leukemie door de bestralingen. Voor aanvullende ondersteuning door voeding en extra voedingssupplementen van bestraling en de bijwerkingen lees ook eens onder bestraling en voeding. Bij 92% van de patiënten - 57 van de 63 deelnemende patiënten - sloeg deze dagelijkse behandeling met 70 GY bestraling aan en de gemiddelde overlevingstijd was 22,4 maanden. 28 patiënten overleefden met een gemiddelde follow-up van 24,7 maanden. De onderzoekers bevelen een fase III studie aan omdat zij vinden dat de resultaten hoopgevend zijn. Hieronder het abstract zoals vermeld in Pubmed.
70 Gy thoracic radiotherapy is feasible concurrent with chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 39808.
Bogart JA, Herndon JE 2nd, Lyss AP, Watson D, Miller AA, Lee ME, Turrisi AT, Green MR; Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 39808.
Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. Bogart@Upstate.edu
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of delivering 70 Gy once-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT), concurrent with chemotherapy, in the treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (L-SCLC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients received two cycles of induction paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) on Day 1) and topotecan (1 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5) with granulocyte colony stimulating factor support, followed by three cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve = 5 on Day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2) on Days 1-3). TRT (70 Gy, 2 Gy/fx/7 weeks) was initiated with the first cycle of carboplatin and etoposide. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was offered to patients achieving a complete response or good partial response.
RESULTS: Ninety percent of patients (57 of 63) proceeded to protocol TRT. There was one treatment-related fatality. Nonhematologic Grade 3/4 toxicities affecting more than 10% of patients, during or after TRT, were dysphagia (16%/5%) and febrile neutropenia (12%/4%). The response rate to all therapy was 92% and the median overall survival is 22.4 months (95% confidence interval 16.1, infinity ). Twenty-eight patients remain alive with a median follow-up of 24.7 months.
CONCLUSION: 70 Gy once-daily TRT can be delivered safely in the cooperative group setting for patients with L-SCLC. Initial efficacy data are encouraging. The hypothesis that high-dose once-daily TRT results in comparable or improved survival compared with twice-daily accelerated TRT warrants testing in a Phase III trial.
.
BCG - Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin: Hier een mini overzicht gepubliceerd van wetenschappelijke studies en bewijzen over het gebruik van BCG - Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin - als succesvolle immuuntherapie bij blaaskanker.
13 september 2004: Bron: Pubmed: Ann Oncol. 2003 Mar;14(3):414-20.
13 juli 2004 werd in the British Journal of Cancer een mini overzicht gepubliceerd van het gebruik van BCG - Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin - bij blaaskanker, als immuuntherapie. Met name in het LUMC - Leiden wordt veel gewerkt en onderzoek gedaan naar BCG bij blaaskanker. Ook in de literatuurlijst van arts-bioloog drs. E. Valstar is deze aanpak van BCG - Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin - bij blaaskanker in vele fase III studies bewezen als effectief en hoopgevend. Voor alle duidelijkheid BCG is een vorm van immuuntherapie gebruikmakend van een bepaalde bacterie die een immunologisch proces op gang brengt. BCG wordt ook bij andere vormen van kanker toegepast. Hieronder het volledige Engelstalige rapport zoals gepubliceerd in the British Journal of Cancer, juli 2004.
Minireview
Role of urothelial cells in BCG immunotherapy for superficial bladder cancer
RFM Bevers*,1, K-H Kurth2 and DHJ Schamhart2 1Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center J3-P, PB 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Academic Medical
Center G-4, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin (BCG) is used for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer, both to reduce the recurrence rate of bladder tumour and to diminish the risk of progression. Since its first therapeutic application in 1976, major research efforts have been directed to decipher the exact mechanism of action of the BCG-associated antitumour effect.
Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin causes an extensive local inflammatory reaction in the bladder wall. Of this, the massive appearance of cytokines in the urine of BCG-treated patients stands out. Activated lymphocytes and macrophages are the most likely sources of these cytokines, but at present other cellular sources such as urothelial tumour cells cannot be ruled out. Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin is internalised and processed both by professional antigen-presenting cells and urothelial tumour cells, resulting in an altered gene expression of these cells that accumulates in the presentation of BCG antigens and secretion of particular cytokines.
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 607–612. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602026 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 13 July 2004 & 2004 Cancer Research UK
Bladder cancer is detected in 75% of patients at an early, superficial stage. The majority of the superficial urothelial cell carcinomas (TCCs) consists of papillary bladder carcinomas (Figure 1A), while the remaining (10%) is called carcinoma in situ (CIS), a high-grade diffuse surface-spreading lesions. The standard treatment is trans-urethral resection (TUR) followed by intravesical instillation with adjuvant, chemo- or immunotherapeutic drugs (Kurth et al, 2000). For treatment of the surgically
nonaccessible CIS, these latter modalities are the only bladder
sparing options available. Although the therapeutic efficacy is well
recognised, a high recurrence rate of 60–70% and a progression
rate of 15% dictate the need for lifelong follow-up and treatment.
Adjuvant agents were introduced to reduce the risk for
recurrence and progression of TCC. Recent, comparative trials
indicate that immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin (BCG;
Figure 1B) is superior to chemotherapy in patients with
intermediate to high risk for recurrence. In these patients, the
benefits of treatment outweigh the burden of side effects.
Moreover, BCG seems to exert a better antitumour effect in CIS
and high-grade cancer (Melekos et al, 1993; Kurth et al, 2000).
Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin, an attenuated strain of Mycobacterium
bovis, was developed by Calmette and Gue´rin with the
intention to generate a vaccine against tuberculosis. The clinical
efficacy of the commercially available strains of BCG, such as
Connaught and Tice, appears to be comparable (Witjes et al, 1996;
Champetier et al, 2000).
Since the first report of intravesical use of BCG in 1976,
investigators try to understand the working mechanism of BCG as
an antitumour modality. Both BCG treatment regimen and dose
are historically determined. Arbitrarily, BCG therapy consists of a
single course of six weekly intravesical instillations. Extension of
BCG treatment (maintenance immunotherapy) is used to increase
efficacy. Despite its success, 30–50% of patients either fail to
respond or relapse within the first 5 years of treatment.
Unfortunately, BCG, a viable, living organism, can cause infections
resulting in side effects ranging from bothersome cystitis in the
majority of patients to sepsis eventually leading to death in rare
cases.
In order to reduce the side effects of BCG and to improve
efficacy, interesting approaches are developed, such as the
application of a cell wall–DNA complex (MCC) of Mycobacterium
phlei, which was effective in patients who failed BCG therapy
(Morales et al, 2001), genetically engineered BCG secreting
relevant cytokines such as human lL-2 (Yamada et al, 2000), or
treatment schedules consisting of three times viable BCG and three
subsequent instillations with killed BCG (De Boer et al, 2003).
This review presents an overview of the current state of ‘BCG
research’. Special attention will be paid to the role of the urothelial
cells in the cascade of events leading to BCG-associated tumour
cell clearance. As an underdeveloped field of research, the
significance of an interaction between potentially hostile bacteria
and epithelial cells is a relatively unknown aspect of the host
immune-defense system. Better knowledge about this interaction
might open new avenues for improvement of the BCG immunotherapy.
Received 15 March 2004; revised 17 May 2004; accepted 26 May 2004;
published online 13 July 2004
*Correspondence: Dr RFM Bevers; E-mail: R.F.M.Bevers@lumc.nl
This review is devoted to the role of the urothelial cell in the mechanism
of BCG action
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 607 – 612
& 2004 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/04 $30.00
www.bjcancer.com
For an actual overview on the practical, clinical aspects of the
immunotherapy for TCC with BCG, the reader is referred to
various, recently published papers (Kurth et al, 2000).
DETAILS OF THE MODE OF ACTION OF BCG
Nowadays, it is generally assumed that the BCG-induced
antitumour activity is critically dominated by a local nonspecific
immunological reaction reflecting the activity of immunocompetent
cells (Alexandroff et al, 1999). It should be realised however
that preceding the activation of the local immune system, some
possibly rate-limiting events need to be executed. The sequential
order of these initial events has been addressed only to a limited
extent.
Interaction of BCG with the bladder wall
Interaction of BCG with the luminal surface of the bladder is the
first step for BCG to accomplish. Accumulation of BCG near the
bladder wall and adherence may be limiting processes for an
adequate, clinical response. Suboptimal binding of BCG may
explain the absence of clinical response in a subgroup of patients
(Ratliff et al, 1987; Schamhart et al, 1994). Experimental
modulation of BCG attachment affects BCG-induced response in
animal models (Hudson et al, 1991). Systematic analysis of the
interaction of BCG with the bladder wall has not been
accomplished, probably due to poor recognition of the biological
and physicochemical processes involved. The process of interaction
should be divided into nonspecific, physicochemical and
specific, receptor–ligand-mediated events.
Physicochemical interaction The luminal side of the bladder is
covered with a layer of hydrophilic, highly sulphated glycosaminoglycans
(GAGs). This GAG layer protects the bladder from toxic
compounds and microorganisms. Both the GAG layer and the BCG
cell wall are highly negatively charged (the zeta potentials). These
conditions prescribe that BCG bacteria accumulate without
adherence, at a close docking distance (70–100 A° ) to the bladder
wall (Figure 1C) (Schamhart et al, 1994). In addition to this
reversible adsorption, physicochemical considerations predict a
low probability of irreversible adherence of BCG to the bladder
wall, due to the high electrostatic, repellent force between the
respective surfaces. The observed, in animals, low abundance of
BCG adherence to the uninjured bladder wall and the dependency
of BCG adherence to diluent properties (pH, salt concentration)
seem to be in accord with these theoretical considerations (Ratliff
et al, 1987; Hudson et al, 1991; Teppema et al, 1992). Damage of
the GAG layer and urothelium may lower the negative charge of
the bladder wall, leading to an increased BCG docking and
adherence, as observed in a murine BCG model after electrocautery
damage of the bladder (Ratliff et al, 1987).
Specific, receptor–ligand-mediated events In addition to nonspecific
interaction, more specific mechanisms seem to be involved
in BCG adherence. A crucial binding of BCG to fibronectin (FN) in
the bladder mucosa has been postulated (Kavoussi et al, 1990).
Fibronectin is part of the extracellular matrix, is equally
distributed on normal and malignant urothelium, and a soluble
form can be found in urine. Binding of BCG to the murine bladder
was impaired with anti-FN antibodies or addition of soluble FN
(Kavoussi et al, 1990). Furthermore, BCG bacteria possess a
receptor with high affinity for the collagen domain of FN, the
fibronectin attachment protein (FAP). These data and the
observation that the clinical effect of BCG therapy is related to
the degree of FN expression on normal mucosa suggest a specific
FN-mediated adherence of BCG to the bladder wall. However, these
experimental, animal data were largely obtained with preinjured
bladders, contradictory to the clinical situation, and a fortuitous
relationship between the efficacy of BCG therapy and fibronectin
has been suggested (Bevers et al, 1998, 2000).
Internalisation of BCG and phenotypical alterations of
urothelial cells
Internalisation of BCG in urothelial cells Several reports show
that urothelial cells are capable of internalisation of BCG (Bevers
et al, 1998, 2000; Durek et al, 1999). Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin
internalisation in vitro is time and dose dependent and can already
be demonstrated after a 15-min incubation period. In a spheroid 3-
D model, internalised BCG was found four cell layers deep,
whereas normal urothelial cells in this system did not internalise
BCG (Durek et al, 1999). Guinea pig studies showed no adherent or
internalised BCG in normal urothelial cells (Teppema et al, 1992).
In malignant cells, BCG internalisation appeared to be cell
differentiation dependent. Contrary to well-differentiated (G1)
bladder tumour cell lines, poorly differentiated (G3) cell lines
exhibit significant internalisation of BCG (Bevers et al, 1998).
Clinically, these data relate well to observations that show a better
response to BCG treatment of high-grade compared to low-grade
tumours (Table 1) (Melekos et al, 1993).
Knowledge about the mechanism of BCG internalisation is
scarce. Fibronectin is suggested to act as a bridging molecule,
binding both to urothelial cells and BCG. Urothelial cells express
an integrin (a5b1 receptor) with affinity for FN (Zhao et al, 2000).
Pretreatment of T24 cells, a human TCC cell line, with anti-FN or
anti-a5b1-receptor antibodies resulted in an impaired BCG
attachment to and internalisation in these cells. However, other
investigators could not inhibit BCG internalisation with anti-FN
antibodies (Schneider et al, 1994; Bevers et al, 2000). The current
available data do not suggest a mandatory role of FN in BCG
internalisation. It seems that BCG internalisation is mediated by
additional molecule(s), possibly coexpressed with FN, such as
heparan sulphate-containing proteoglycans interacting with the
mycobacterial heparin-binding haemagglutinin adhesin (HBHA)
(Schneider et al, 1994; Bevers et al, 2000).
Regardless of the exact mechanism of internalisation, intracellular
BCG is transported within phagosomes. These fuse with
lysosomes to form phagolysosomes. Recent evidence shows that
intracellular, live BCG can interfere with this phagolysosome
formation (Maksymowych and Kane, 2000). However, only a small
fraction of commercially available BCG preparations consists of
live BCG. Therefore, most BCG particles will be degraded, and
mycobacterial glycoproteins and lipoproteins are transported to
the cell surface (Neyrolles et al, 2001).
Patient studies, analysing bladder washings after BCG instillations,
revealed vigorous phagocytosis of BCG by leucocytes.
However, concerning internalised BCG in urothelial cells, conflicting
results are reported (Teppema et al, 1992). Accepting the
inability of normal urothelial cells to internalise BCG, these
conflicting observations may be explained by the presence or
absence of residual urinary tumour cells in the limited number of
patients included in both studies.
In summary, BCG particles can be internalised and processed by
residual, especially high-grade tumour cells. As a consequence, the
possibility that BCG introduces phenotypical alterations of TCC
Table 1 Recurrence rate/100 patients-months in patients with superficial
bladder cancer, following TUR with and without adjuvant intravesical BCG
instillationsa
Treatment Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3
TUR 1.5 NS 3.67 Po0.01 20.83 Po0.002
TUR+BCG 1.18 1.02 1.26
aData from Melekos et al (1993); NS¼not significant.
BCG therapy for bladder cancer
RFM Bevers et al
608
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(4), 607 – 612 & 2004 Cancer Research UK
cells that affect tumoricidal effector mechanisms has been a subject
of study. Several effects, ranging from a direct antiproliferative/
cytotoxic effect of BCG, to a role in the initiation and/or
modulation of the host immune response, and to an increase of
susceptibility of tumour cells, have been proposed.
Cytotoxic effects of BCG on BCG-internalising urothelial
cells
In vitro studies with human TCC cell lines show that BCG exerts
cytolytic, antiproliferative and antimotility effects. The inhibitory
effects on cell proliferation were most pronounced in highly
dedifferentiated cell lines. Today, the causal mechanisms are
unknown. Internalised BCG increased the production of cytotoxic
nitric oxide (NO) in TCC cells. Patients treated with BCG showed
an augmented bladder NO production and an upregulation of
urothelial-associated nitric oxide synthase (Jansson et al, 1998).
NO, at high concentration, may cause DNA damage, and cytostatic
and cytotoxic effects. Possible accumulation of DNA damage may
be related to the observation that, contrary to nontreated patients,
urothelial cells of BCG-treated patients express regulatory genes
related to DNA repair, knowingly wild-type p53 and P21waf1/cip1
(Fontana et al, 1999). Whether these observations represent an
indirect or direct cytotoxic effect of BCG in situ remains unclear.
Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin-internalising urothelial cells and
the initiation/modulation of the immune response
Activation of the host immune system has been considered an
exclusive characteristic of professional antigen-presenting cells
(APCs), like dendritic cells and macrophages. New insights
support a role for the interaction of (airway)epithelial cells and
bacteria in the initiation of the immunological cascade (Levine,
1995; Neyrolles et al, 2001). Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin-treated
urothelial tumour cells are now considered as active participants in
the cytokine-mediated initiation and/or regulation of the early
immune response (Alexandroff et al, 1999).
The initial immune response to BCG
The local immune response
to bacteria, including live BCG, is complex, but the presentation of
bacterial antigens by APC to T-helper cells is the pivotal
interaction (Alexandroff et al, 1999). Derived from an extensive
series of papers, it appears that, after internalisation and
processing by professional APC, processed BCG antigen(s) become
associated with MHC class II molecules (Figure 1D). The antigen–
MHC class II complex is expressed at the cell surface to be
recognised by CD4þ T-helper lymphocytes via the T-cell receptor
(TCR) molecule (Figure 1E). Along with this binding, the
interaction between the APC and CD4þ T cell is only fully
accomplished by an additional series of costimulatory, but
essential, interacting molecules. Among others, binding of CD4
to MHC class II, lymphocyte function-associated antigen-3 (LFA-
3) to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and CD28
(CD4þ cell) to B7 enhances the conjugation of the cells and
promotes T-cell activation signals. Soluble cytokines, such as IL-2,
IL-6 and IFN-g, provide generation of APC and T cells and ‘finetuning’.
Depending on many nonspecific factors, including antigen dose,
type of APC and the expression of the mentioned membranebound
costimulatory signals of the T-helper cells, a so-called Th1-
type, and to some degree a Th2-type, response develops during
BCG treatment. The Th1 or cell-mediated immune response
and the Th2 or humoral immune response are characterised by
the patterns of cytokines, secreted by the CD4þ T-helper
cells following antigen-specific stimulation. In mouse models, the
Th1 response is primarily characterised by IL-2, IL-12, IFN-g and
TNF-b, and the Th2 response by IL-4, IL-5, IL-6 and IL-10. The
recognition that this description of two types of responses reflects
the human immune response and that they are regulated in a
reciprocal fashion, critically regulated by the cytokines, represent a
major advance in the field of antitumour cytotoxicity mechanisms.
Knowledge concerning the APC–T-helper cell interaction and
development of Th1 and Th2 responses has been used to study the
BCG-induced role of the urothelium in antigen presentation and
initiation of the immune response.
Uroepithelial tumour cells and antigen-presenting properties Immunocompetence
of the host is essential for BCG therapy.
Dendritic cells, macrophages and CD4þ T lymphocytes play a
crucial role in the antitumour effect. In addition, evidence exists
for an important role of epithelial, TCC cancer cells. Mouse
bladder tumour cells present BCG antigen to CD4þ T cells, via
MHC class II molecules (Lattime et al, 1992). The initial
observations were extended for another murine cell line and a
panel of human cell lines. Constitutive and BCG-induced expres-
A
B
C
E
F
H
G
D Antigen presenting
cells
APC
BCG
+
Bladder
Adherence
and
phagocytosis
Processing
and
antigen
presentation
Cytokine
production
Cytokine
production
Th1-type
response
or
cell-mediated
immune
response
Cell-mediated
tumour cell
eradication
CD4+
T cell
cell
G1
Th1 response
IL-2, IL-12,
IFN-_, TNF-_
Th2 response
IL-5, IL-6, IL-10
Inflammation
Side-effects
Natural killer
cell
Bladder cancer
cell
Macrophage
Cytotoxic
T cell
Cell-mediated
Immune Response
G2 G3
Grade
APC properties
TCC
Figure 1 Simplified scheme of the supposed mechanism of action of
BCG in tumour cell eradication. After its instillation in the bladder (A), BCG
(B) accumulates near the bladder wall, followed by adherence and passage
through the GAG layer of the bladder wall (C). Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin is
internalised and processed by professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs)
and (high-grade) tumour cells (D), and BCG antigens are presented to
CD4þ T cells (E). Depending on various conditions, this results in the local
synthesis of a particular set of cytokines, known as the Th1-type or cellmediated
immune response (F, G). The Th1 cytokine profile enables
recruitment and maturation of cytotoxic effector cells. No definite
statements can be made yet about the actual effector cell(s), but a key
role for NK cells in tumour cell killing has been proposed (H).
BCG therapy for bladder cancer
RFM Bevers et al
609
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(4), 607 – 612 & 2004 Cancer Research UK
sion of MHC class II and the major costimulatory molecules
ICAM-1 and B7-1 was observed. The antigen presentation factors
are enhanced in high-grade TCC cell lines only (Figure 1D) (Ikeda
et al, 2002). Quantitative immunohistochemistry has confirmed
the in vitro findings. Serial bladder biopsies and urinary cytospins,
taken before and after BCG therapy, revealed an upregulation of
MHC class II and ICAM-1 expression of urothelial tumour cells
(Jackson et al, 1994).
Interestingly and likely of uttermost importance, recently non-
MHC-encoded, CD1-restricted presentation of (glyco)lipid antigens
has been recognised (Maksymowych and Kane, 2000).
Although for BCG no data are available yet, CD4þ CD1-restricted
T cells were observed in patients suffering from Mycobacterium
leprae (Sieling et al, 2000). These cells produce IFN-g, but not IL-4.
Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin therapy-related research has revealed an
increased CD1 expression of TCC cell lines in the presence of live
BCG (Ikeda et al, 2002) and a virtual absence of urinary IL-4
during BCG treatment (Nadler et al, 2003). Accordingly, it is
tempting to hypothesise that CD1-facilitated BCG antigen presentation
contributes to the development of BCG immunity.
In summary, epithelial TCC cells gain the phenotypical
characteristics and functioning of APCs in the presence of BCG.
These functions strongly suggest that the BCG–high-grade tumour
cell interaction acts in cohort with the BCG–professional APC
interaction. Clinical observations seem to confirm this conclusion,
since BCG therapy seems to exert a better antitumour effect in
high-grade bladder cancer (Table 1).
Secretion of cytokines by urothelial tumour cells
Multiple studies have reported on cytokine production as a result
of BCG therapy. Following intravesical BCG instillations, there is
an increase in the urinary level of several cytokines, such as IL-1,
IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-18, TNF-a and IFN-g. Undoubtedly, the
major cell sources are the immunocompetent cells, but urothelial
cells contribute to a significant degree. In vitro studies with human
TCC cells revealed a BCG-induced upregulation of the cytokines
IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, GM-CSF, TNF-a and IFN-a, but not IFN-g, IL-2,
IL-4 and IL-12 (Figure 1F and G) (Boer de et al, 1997; Bevers et al,
1998). Of all cytokines produced by TCC cell lines, the cytokines
IL-6 and IL-8 are highly prominent and their role will be discussed
here in some detail.
Interleukin-6 Within the challenged immune system, several cell
types including APC produce IL-6. This multifunctional cytokine is
critically involved in the acute phase response, T-cell proliferation,
B-cell maturation, macrophage maturation and cytotoxic T-cell
differentiation. In combination with IL-1, IL-2 and IFN-g, IL-6
induces expression of the IL-2 receptor (IL-2R), thus participating
in the activation of resting T cells (Lauta, 2003). Furthermore, Il-6
seems to contribute to MHC-nonrestricted cytotoxic activity by
inducing natural killer (NK) cell proliferation. Nowadays, NK cells
are considered as essential, cytotoxic effector cells during BCG
therapy (Figure 1H) (Brandau et al, 2001).
High-grade TCC cell lines show a high constitutive and BCGinduced
production of IL-6. However, the importance of IL-6
produced by bladder cancer cells in the BCG-induced immune
response remains to be established. In vitro studies revealed that
IL-6 mRNA upregulation and IL-6 production depend on BCG
dose, incubation period, BCG internalisation and TCC cell grade
(Bevers et al, 1998). Interleukin-6 production requires a minimal
BCG exposure time of 0.5–1 h, which is in accordance with clinical
practice.
Interleukin-6 is considered a major source of early Th1/Th2
control during CD4þ T-cell activation as it attributes to the
promotion of the Th2 response and simultaneously inhibition of
Th1 polarisation (Figure 1G). Interleukin-6 activates the production
of IL-4 by CD4þ T cells and their differentiation into Th2
effector cells. Moreover, it inhibits Th1 differentiation by
interference with IFN-g signalling and the development of Th1
cells (Diehl and Rincon, 2002). The abundant IL-6 response during
BCG therapy and virtually the absence of urinary IL-4 seem to be
however in conflict with the recognition that the presence of BCG
primarily induces a Th1 response. The absence of IL-4 and a high
production of IFN-g may prevent or contradict the Th2-promoting
effect of IL-6. Moreover, this finding suggests an important role of
the CD1-restricted presentation of (glyco)lipid antigens of live
BCG , since CD4þ CD1-restricted T cells produce IFN-g but not
IL-4 (Sieling et al, 2000; Ikeda et al, 2002).
Interleukin-8 Interleukin-8 is a proinflammatory cytokine with
strong chemotactic properties, attracting T lymphocytes and
neutrophils. Interleukin-8 is induced rapidly, already after the
first instillation, during BCG therapy (Boer de et al, 1997).
Dendritic cells, macrophages and a number of other cells,
including TCC cell lines, produce IL-8. The early urinary IL-8
production in vivo may indicate the significance of an interaction
of BCG bacilli with (residual) bladder cancer cells in the initiation
of the host immune response.
Cell-mediated antitumour effects: the effector cells
The final step in the eradication of tumour cells consists of
mobilisation and activation of cytotoxic effector cells (Figure 1H).
Several in vitro studies show evidence for several nonspecific cytolytic
cells like NK cells, BCG-activated killer cells (BAKs), macrophageactivated
killer cells (MAKs), lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAKs)
and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (Kawashima et al, 2003).
A key role is supposed for NK cells (Brandau et al, 2001). NK
cells, a special population of mononuclear cells, recognise ‘self’-
peptides presented by MHC class I molecules on the surface of cells.
A cell not displaying these peptides in a correct way is attacked and
killed by NK cells (Ka¨rre, 1995). In untreated bladder cancer
patients, a loss or alteration of MHC class I expression is seen in
tumour cells (Saint et al, 2001). Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin-infected
cells present BCG glycoprotein and lipoprotein antigens on their
MHC class I molecule (Neyrolles et al, 2001). This may be a trigger
for NK cells to attack BCG-infected urothelial tumour cells. Bacillus
Calmette-Gue´rin therapy in the murine model, using NK celldeficient
mice, is ineffective (Brandau et al, 2001).
However, in
studies regarding the presence of NK cells after BCG therapy,
relatively few NK cells were seen 3 weeks after the last instillation of
a 6-week course (Lattime et al, 1992; Saint et al, 2001). It would be
interesting to know if NK cells are more abundant earlier, during the
BCG course. Strong direct evidence for NK cell or other effector
cell(s) is still lacking. The recent acknowledgement of effector cells
that recognise mycobacterial (glyco)lipid antigens through nonpolymorphic
MHC molecules, such as CD1, may provide new
insights into the true nature of the cytolytic effector cells involved in
tumour cell eradication during BCG treatment (Maksymowych and
Kane, 2000; Kawashima et al, 2003).
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Current insight of the mode of action of BCG, ranging from its
introduction into the bladder to killing of residual tumour cells,
has revealed a complex sequence of processes. Bacillus Calmette-
Gue´rin accumulates near, and adheres to, the bladder wall. After
passage through the GAG layer, BCG is internalised and processed
by professional APC and tumour cells. The modified gene
expression of these cells accumulates in the secretion of particular
cytokines and presentation of BCG antigens. Bacillus Calmette-
Gue´rin antigens are presented via MHC class II molecules to CD4þ
T cells and via MHC class I molecules to CD8þ T cells. Lipid and
glycolipid BCG antigens can be presented to CD4þ and CD8þ T
BCG therapy for bladder cancer
RFM Bevers et al
610
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(4), 607 – 612 & 2004 Cancer Research UK
cells in a non-MHC-restricted, CD1-restricted fashion. Production
of chemokines, such as IL-8, secreted partly by BCG-internalised
tumour cells, contributes to the local activation of the immune
system. Consequently, activated leucocytes and mononuclear cells
invade the bladder wall. These developments provide the condition
for a Th1 response, associated with particular cytokines (IFN-g, IL-
2, IL-12 and TNF-b). This cytokines profile promotes delayed-type
hypersensitivity response, cytotoxic cell response, and macrophage
activation or cellular immune inflammatory reaction. Depending
on bacterial and host components, an upregulation of the Th2
response, associated with cytokines IL-6 and IL-10, may occur to
some degree and adversely affect the functioning of the Th1
response. The Th1 cytokine profile enables recruitment and
maturation of cytotoxic effector cells.
No definite statements can be made yet about the actual effector
cell(s), but a crucial, cytotoxic role of NK cells has been proposed.
In addition, some of the cytokines, and BCG itself, may exhibit a
direct cytotoxic effect on tumour cells.
In 28 years of major research efforts, understanding of the mode
of action underlying BCG therapy for bladder carcinoma is
obviously much improved. Yet the jigsaw is not complete and
many details wait unraveling. However, if successful, the reward
might be a better, evidence-based BCG immunotherapy with
optimal clinical efficacy and minimal occurrence of side effects in
the form of an optimal BCG dose and treatment schedule,
genetically engineered BCG, or particular antigenic molecule(s)
that trigger immunological antitumour activity in a well-controlled
manner.
REFERENCES
Alexandroff AB, Jackson AM, O’Donnell MA, James K (1999) BCG
immunotherapy of bladder cancer: 20 years on. Lancet 353: 1689–1694
Bevers RFM, de Boer EC, Kurth K-H, Schamhart DHJ (1998) BCG-induced
interleukin-6 upregulation and BCG internalization in well and poorly
differentiated human bladder cancer cell lines. Eur Cytokine Network 9:
181–186
Bevers RFM, de Boer EC, Kurth K-H, Schamhart DHJ (2000) BCG
internalization in human bladder cancer cell lines, especially with regard
to cell surface-expressed fibronectin. Aktuelle Urol 31(Suppl 1): 31–34
Boer de EC, Somogyi L, de Ruiter GJ, de Reijke TM, Kurth KH, Schamhart
DH (1997) Role of interleukin-8 in onset of the immune response
in intravesical BCG therapy for superficial bladder cancer. Urol Res 25:
31–34
Brandau S, Riemensberger J, Jacobsen M, Kemp D, Zhao W, Zhao X,
Jocham D, Ratliff TL, Bo¨hle A (2001) NK cells are essential for the
effective BCG immunotherapy. Int J Cancer 92: 697–702
Champetier D, Valignat C, Lopez JG, Ruffion A, Devonec M, Perrin P (2000)
Intravesical BCG-therapy: comparison of side effects of Connaught
(Toronto) and Pasteur (Paris) strains [Article in French]. Prog Urol 10:
542–547
De Boer EC, Rooijakkers SJ, Schamhart DH, Kurth KH (2003) Cytokine
gene expression in a mouse model: the first instillations with viable
bacillus Calmette-Guerin determine the succeeding Th1 response. J Urol
170: 2004– 2008
Diehl S, Rincon M (2002) The two faces of IL-6 on Th1/Th2 differentiation.
Mol Immunol 39: 531–536
Durek C, Brandau S, Ulmer AJ, Flad HD, Jocham D, Bo¨hle A (1999)
Bacillus-Calmette-Gue´rin (BCG) and 3D tumors: an in vitro model for
the study of adhesion and invasion. J Urol 162: 600–605
Fontana D, Bellina M, Galietti F, Scoffone C, Cagnazzi E, Guercio S, Cappia
S, Pozzi E (1999) Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin (BCG) as inducer
of tumor suppressing proteins p53 and p21Waf1-Cip1 during treatment of
superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 162: 225–230
Hudson MA, Brown EJ, Ritchey JK, Ratliff TL (1991) Modulation of
fibronectin-mediated Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin attachment to murine
bladder mucosa by drugs influencing the coagulation pathways. Cancer
Res 51: 3726–3732
Ikeda N, Toida I, Iwasaki A, Kawai K, Akaza H (2002) Surface
antigen expression on bladder tumor cells induced by bacillus
Calmette-Gue´rin (BCG): a role of BCG internalization into tumor cells.
Int J Urol 9: 29– 35
Jackson AM, Alexandroff AB, McIntyre M, Esuvaranathan K, James K,
Chisholm GD (1994) Induction of ICAM 1 expression on bladder tumors
by BCG immunotherapy. J Clin Pathol 47: 309–312
Jansson OT, Morcos E, Brundin L, Lundberg JO, Adolfsson J, Soderhall M,
Wiklund NP (1998) The role of nitric oxide in bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin
mediated anti-tumor effects in human bladder cancer. Br J Cancer 78:
588–592
Ka¨rre K (1995) Express yourself or die: Peptides, MHC molecules and NK
cells. Science 267: 978– 979
Kavoussi LR, Brown EJ, Ritchey JK, Ratliff TL (1990) Fibronectin-mediated
Calmette-Gue´rin bacillus attachment to murine bladder mucosa.
Requirement for the expression of an antitumor response. J Clin Invest
85: 62–67
Kawashima T, Norose Y, Watanabe Y, Enomoto Y, Narazaki H,
Watari E, Tanaka S, Takahashi H, Yano I, Brenner MB, Sugita M
(2003) Cutting edge: major CD8 T cell response to live bacillus
Calmette-Gue`rin is mediated by CD1 molecules. J Immunol 170:
5345– 5348
Kurth KH, Bouffioux C, Sylvester R, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W,
Brausi M (2000) Treatment of superficial bladder tumors: achievements
and needs The EORTC Genitourinary Group. Eur Urol 37(Suppl
3): 1–9
Lattime EC, Gomella LG, McCue P (1992) Murine bladder carcinoma
cells present antigen to BCG-specific CD4+ T-cells. Cancer Res 52:
4286– 4290
Lauta VM (2003) A review of the cytokine network in multiple myeloma:
diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Cancer 97:
2440– 2452
Levine SJ (1995) Bronchial epithelial cell–cytokine interactions in airway
inflammation. J Invest Med 43: 241 –249
Maksymowych WP, Kane KP (2000) Bacterial modulation of antigen
processing and presentation. Microb Infect 2: 199–211
Melekos MD, Chionis H, Pantazakos A, Fokaefs E, Paranychianakis G,
Dauaher H (1993) Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin immunoprophylaxis
of superficial bladder cancer: results of a controlled
prospective trial with modified treatment schedule. J Urol 149:
744–748
Morales A, Chin JL, Ramsey EW (2001) Mycobacterial cell wall extract
for the treatment of carcinoma in situ of the bladder. J Urol 166:
1633– 1638
Nadler R, Luo Y, Zhao W, Ritchey JK, Austin JC, Cohen MB, O’Donnell MA,
Ratliff TL (2003) Interleukin 10 induced augmentation of delayed-type
hypersensitivity (DTH) enhances Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-
Gue´rin (BCG) mediated antitumor activity. Clin Exp Immunol 131:
206–216
Neyrolles O, Gould K, Gares MP, Brett S, Janssen R, O’Gaora P, Herrmann
JL, Prevost MC, Perret E, Thole JE, Young D (2001) Lipoprotein access to
MHC class I presentation during infection of murine macrophages with
live mycobacteria. J Immunol 166: 447–457
Ratliff TL, Palmer JO, McGarr JA, Brown EJ (1987) Intravesical Bacillus
Calmette-Gue´rin therapy for murine bladder tumors: initiation of the
response by fibronectin-mediated attachment of Bacillus Calmette-
Gue´rin. Cancer Res 47: 1762–1766
Saint F, Patard JJ, Groux Muscatelli B, Lefefre Belda MA, Gil Diez de
Medina S, Abbou CC, Chopin DK (2001) Evaluation of cellular tumor
rejection mechanisms in the peritumoral bladder wall after bacillus
Calmette-Gue´rin treatment. BJU Int 88: 602–610
Schamhart DH, De Boer EC, Vleeming R, Kurth KH (1994) Theoretical and
experimental evidence on the use of glycosaminoglycans in BCGmediated
immunotherapy of superficial bladder cancer. Semin Thromb
Hemost 20: 301 –309
Schneider B, Thanhauser A, Jocham D, Loppnow H, Vollmer E, Galle J,
Flad HD, Ulmer AJ, Bo¨hle A (1994) Specific binding of bacillus
Calmette-Gue´rin to urothelial tumor cells in vitro. World J Urol 12:
337–344
Sieling PA, Ochoa MT, Jullien D, Leslie DS, Sabet S, Rosat JP, Burdick AE,
Rea TH, Brenner MB, Porcelli SA, Modlin RL (2000) Evidence for human
BCG therapy for bladder cancer
RFM Bevers et al 611 British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(4), 607 – 612 & 2004 Cancer Research UK
CD4+ T cells in the CD1-restricted repertoire: derivation of mycobacteria-
reactive T cells from leprosy lesions. J Immunol 164: 4790– 4796
Teppema JS, de Boer EC, Steerenberg PA, van der Meijden AP (1992)
Morphological aspects of the interaction of Bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin
with urothelial bladder cells in vivo and in vitro: relevance for antitumor
activity? Urol Res 20: 219–228
Witjes WP, Witjes JA, Oosterhof GO, Debruyne MJ (1996) Update on the
Dutch Cooperative Trial: mitomycin versus bacillus Calmette-Tice-Tice
versus bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin RIVM in the treatment of patients with
pTA-pT1 papillary carcinoma and carcinoma in situ of the urinary
bladder. Dutch South East Cooperative Urological Group. Semin Urol
Oncol 14(Suppl 1): 10–16
Yamada H, Matsumoto S, Matsumoto T, Yamada T, Yamashita U (2000)
Murine IL-2 secreting recombinant Bacillus Calmette-Gue`rin augments
macrophage-mediated cytotoxicity against murine bladder cancer MBT-
2. J Urol 164: 526–531
Zhao W, Schorey JS, Bong-Mastek M, Ritchey J, Brown EJ, Ratliff TL (2000)
Role of a bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin fibronectin attachment protein in
BCG-induced antitumor activity. Int J Cancer 86: 83–88
BCG therapy for bladder cancer RFM Bevers et al 612
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(4), 607 – 612 & 2004 Cancer Research UK
Bestraling - inwendig: Hoge dosis radioactief jodium verlengt leven van patiënten met uitgezaaide carcinoid significant, 5,75 jaren tegenover 2,09 jaren, aldus 15 jarige studie bij 96 patiënten, waarbij andere medicijnen en aanpak niets meer hielp
30 september 2004: Bron: Pubmed: Cancer. 2004 Sep 28
Hoge dosis radioactief jodium - ook wel bekend als inwendige bestraling - als aanvulling gegeven aan patiënten met uitgezaaide carcinoid, waarbij alle andere medicijnen en aanpak niets hielp geeft significant betere resultaten op langere overlevingstijd. De studie bij 98 patiënten en gevolgd over 15 jaar is opgezet om te meten wat het effect zou zijn van toevoeging van een bepaalde dosis radioactief gelabeld jodium - 401 +/- 202 millicuries (mCi) (131)I-MIBG. De patiënten die daarop reageerden met een symptomatische respons - wat dat precies is durven we niet te zeggen, maar weet uw arts beslist wel - overleefden gemiddeld 5,75 jaren tegenover 2,09 jaren in controlegroep. (5.76 years vs. 2.09 years; P < 0.01), een hoog significant resultaat dus. Bij 56 patienten waarvan de 5-HIAA waarden werden gevolgd - gemonitored, zakten de gemiddelde urine 5-HIAA waarden significant na (131)I-MIBG behandeling (126 +/- 122 ng/mL vs. 91 +/- 125 ng/mL; P < 0.01); echter, de patiënten met gereduceerde 5-HIAA waarden bij aanvang hadden geen verbeterde overleving (4.11 years vs. 3.42 years; P = 0.2). Patiënten die een initiële (131)I-MIBG dosis van meer dan 400 mCi kregen leefden weer wel significant langer dan patiënten die minder dan 400 mCi (4.69 years vs. 1.86 years; P = 0.05) kregen toegediend. Toxische bijwerkingen van deze aanpak zijn - pancytopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and emesis.
Met dank aan Maud die deze bijwerkingen in het Nederlands aan ons uitlegt:
Brachytherapie in combinatie met LITT behandeling blijkt succesvol bij levertumoren aldus fase II studie.
Brachytherapie in combinatie met LITT behandeling blijkt succesvol bij levertumoren aldus fase II studie.
d.d. 3 mei 2004: Bron: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1496-505.
Een combinatie van brachythrapie met LITT behandeling (zie ook dr. Vogl) van levertumoren blijkt uiterst succesvol aldus fase II studie uitgevoerd in Berlijn. We zullen dit abstract later vertalen maar hier het Engelse abstract zoals uit Pubmed gehaald.
CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy of liver malignancies alone or in combination with thermal ablation: phase I-II results of a novel technique.
Ricke J, Wust P, Stohlmann A, Beck A, Cho CH, Pech M, Wieners G, Spors B, Werk M, Rosner C, Hanninen EL, Felix R.
Klinik fur Strahlenheilkunde, Charite Virchow-Klinikum Medical Faculty of the Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany. jens.ricke@charite.de
PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of CT-guided brachytherapy alone or in combination with laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) in patients with liver malignancies.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven patients presented with 36 liver metastases and two primary liver carcinomas. Twenty-one patients were treated with CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy alone using a 192Ir source. Sixteen patients received brachytherapy directly after MRI-guided LITT. The indications for brachytherapy alone were a tumor size >5 cm, adjacent central bile duct or adjacent major vessels causing unfavorable cooling effects for thermal ablation, and technical failures of LITT. The dosimetry for brachytherapy was performed using three-dimensional CT data acquired after percutaneous applicator positioning. On average, a minimal dose of 17 Gy inside the tumor margin was applied (range, 10-20 Gy).
RESULTS: The mean tumor size was 4.6 cm (range, 2.5-11 cm). The mean liver volume receiving > or =5 Gy was 16% (range, 2-40%) of the total liver. Severe complications were recorded in 2 patients (5%). One patient developed acute liver failure possibly related to accidental continuation of oral capecitabine treatment. Another patient demonstrated obstructive jaundice owing to tumor edema after irradiation of a metastasis adjacent to the bile duct bifurcation. A commonly encountered moderate increase of liver enzymes was greatest in patients with combined treatment. The local control rate after 6 months was 73% and 87% for combined treatment and brachytherapy alone, respectively.
CONCLUSION: CT-guided brachytherapy using three-dimensional CT data for dosimetry is safe and effective alone or in combination with LITT. Brachytherapy as a stand-alone treatment displayed genuine advantages over thermal tumor ablation.
COBALT: Combination Bacteriolytic Therapy = chemo en bacteriën succesvol in dierproeven, maar wordt ook bekritiseerd door hoge toxiciteit
Dit bericht overgeheveld vanuit kankernieuws, al geplaatst daar in 2001, naar hier actueel regulier onderzoek per 7 september 2004. We hebben alle mogelijke informatie hierover uit Pubmed gehaald en toegevoegd, inclusief de discussie en gehanteerde protocollen enz. Deze aanpak met combinatie van bacteriën en chemo ligt o.i. in het verlengde van bv. het Newcastle virus, al in fase II studies bewezen effectief te zijn en het adenovirus waar Engelse onderzoekers recent mee experimenteren. Onder dit oude bericht veel nieuwe informatie. O.a. ook een kritische beschouwing van een collega onderzoeker, die o.i. een paar gevoelige punten van deze gehanteerde methode aanstipt. Wel jammer dat er blijkbaar na 2001 niet verder mee is gegaan althans wij kunnen niets verder aan publicaties hierover vinden. Onderstaande is gepubliceerd: November 27, 2001, 10.1073/pnas.251543698
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 December 18; 98 (26): 15155–15160 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.251543698
Al eerder is dit nieuws gemeld via internet enz. , maar nu is ook in het
Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde hiervan melding gemaakt. Een belangrijke doorbraak
lijkt te zijn bewerkstelligd in het behandelen van kanker waarbij een combinatie
van chemo en een bepaald soort bacteriën binnen 24 uur (!!!!) bij 7 van
de 8 muizen de kankertumoren volledig deed afsterven. Nu is al langer bekend dat
kankercellen niet tegen zuurstof kunnen. Het is niet voor niets dat mensen met
kanker wordt aangeraden veel te wandelen, te sporten en in bepaalde
privèklinieken , bv. in Duitsland, wordt zuurstof kunstmatig in het bloed
gebracht ter ondersteuning van de behandeling. Ook professor Warburg,
Nobelprijswinnaar, toonde aan dat kankercellen niet kunnen groeien in een
zuurstofrijke omgeving. Dit kleine berichtje lijkt dan ook een van de vele, maar
m.i. is dit een uitermate belangrijke ontdekking en vooral ook omdat de
reguliere wetenschappers nu eindelijk het nut hiervan inzien. Hierbij het
artikeltje uit het Tijdschrift voor geneeskunde en daaronder het Engelse
abstract en beschrijving van de universiteit waar dit onderzoek plaatsvond. Cursief
gedrukt zijn toevoegingen van de persoon die me dit toestuurde, waarvoor
dank uiteraard.
Bron Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde:
Anaërobe bacteriën vernietigen kankercellen. (anaëroob betekent, dat ze een hekel aan zuurstof hebben - ze dood gaan in de aanwezigheid van zuurstof)
Chemotherapeutica zijn niet of nauwelijks in staat om neoplastische cellen (kankercellen
dus) in slecht gevasculariseerde (doorbloede) gedeelten van tumoren te doden.
Dang et al. hebben 26 verschillende soorten anaërobe bacteriën getest op hun vermogen in anoxische
(niet van zuurstof voorziene) gebieden van tumoren te groeien en omliggende neoplastische cellen te vernietigen. Clostridium novyi-NT
(een C. novyi-variant die geen toxine aanmaakt) bleek hiertoe zeer goed in staat. In combinatie met conventionele chemotherapeutische middelen ontstond meestal binnen 24 uur een uitgebreide hemorragische
(vergezeld van, t.g.v. van, gekenmerkt door bloeding) necrose (weefselversterf -
afsterving), hetgeen resulteerde in een verlengd antitumoreffect van de behandeling. Sommige tumoren kwamen al na één behandeling in complete regressie. Deze methode, die de onderzoekers "combination bacteriolytic therapy" (COBALT) noemen, is mogelijk een geheel nieuwe manier om kanker te bestrijden. (Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 2001;98:15155-60)
Bron: Website van John Hopkins Universiteit
Zeroing In on Tumors With "Smart Bombs" of Bacteria
Scientists at Johns Hopkins's Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center have begun recruiting an unlikely ally in the war against cancer: a genetically modified soil bacterium, Clostridium novyi (C. novyi). Clinicians one day may be able to use it as a kind of biological smart bomb against tumors.
Hopkins oncology professors Bert Vogelstein and Kenneth Kinzler are developing the new approach, which they call COBALT (for combination bacteriolytic therapy), to take advantage of the oxygen-poor environment inside some cancers.
Some advanced cancers grow so quickly that they can't coerce the body into growing enough new blood vessels to support the tumor cells. This can leave areas inside the tumors with poor blood circulation, low levels of oxygen, and masses of dead and dying cells.
Chemotherapy drugs have a hard time reaching such areas because of the poor blood circulation, and radiation therapy relies on the presence of oxygen to trigger cell death. As a result, after traditional treatments stop, cancerous cells can start growing again.
Vogelstein, who is the Clayton Professor of Oncology and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator, said the idea of using bacteria to combat cancer originated with German scientists, who unsuccessfully tried to attack tumors with bacteria about 50 years ago. Vogelstein and other Hopkins researchers, renewing the attempt to develop this approach, about a year ago began systematically screening bacteria fond of oxygen-poor environments, searching for a species that would thrive in such environments and kill tumor cells.
They settled on C. novyi as the best candidate but found they first had to partially defang the virus by genetically removing its ability to produce a toxin with potentially lethal side effects. Tests in mice with tumors showed the bacteria worked almost exactly as they'd hoped, wiping out cells within cancerous tissue, but dying out as it approached the oxygen-rich healthy tissue on the perimeters of the tumor.
"The idea is to selectively attack these tumors from inside with the bacteria and from the outside with chemotherapy," said Vogelstein.
The combined approach produced dramatic results in mice, destroying more than half the tumors treated within 24 hours. In a paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on November 27, 2001, the researchers reported that COBALT treatments shrank or eliminated tumors in seven of eight mice. One mouse relapsed but responded well to a second treatment.
Co-author Kinzler cautioned that several years of research will be necessary before scientists can begin human clinical trials of COBALT.
"We hope that this research will add a new dimension to cancer treatment but realize that the way tumors respond to treatment in mice can be different than in humans," said Kinzler.
Researchers must also learn which chemotherapy agents will work best with the bacteria, and whether they can use other drugs to combat the effects of toxins created by the rapid destruction of tumors, a phenomenon known as tumor lysis. --Michael Purdy
Artsen en oncologen die nadere informatie over deze experimentele benadering wil kan direct contact opnemen met The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, 1650 Orleans Street, Room 589, Baltimore, MD 21231-1001. E-mail:
vogelbe@welch.jhu.edu.
Hieronder het abstract van de beschreven en gepubliceerde studie:
Medical Sciences
Combination bacteriolytic therapy for the treatment of experimental tumors
Long H. Dang, Chetan Bettegowda, David L. Huso, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein*
The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Division of Comparative Medicine, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231
Contributed by Bert Vogelstein, October 12, 2001
Current chemotherapeutic approaches for cancer are in part limited by the inability of drugs to destroy neoplastic cells within poorly vascularized compartments of tumors. We have here systematically assessed anaerobic bacteria for their capacity to grow expansively within avascular compartments of transplanted tumors. Among 26 different strains tested, one (Clostridium novyi) appeared particularly promising. We created a strain of C. novyi devoid of its lethal toxin (C. novyi-NT) and showed that intravenously injected C. novyi-NT spores germinated within the avascular regions of tumors in mice and destroyed surrounding viable tumor cells. When C. novyi-NT spores were administered together with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, extensive hemorrhagic necrosis of tumors often developed within 24 h, resulting in significant and prolonged antitumor effects. This strategy, called combination bacteriolytic therapy (COBALT), has the potential to add a new dimension to the treatment of cancer.
Introduction
Despite enormous progress in understanding the pathophysiology of neoplasia, advanced forms of cancer remain recalcitrant to treatment. Although the basis for this failure is complex, one reason is that most tumors contain large, poorly vascularized areas that limit the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs (1). The poorly vascularized regions are less sensitive to ionizing radiation because its cell-killing effects depend on oxygen; they are less sensitive to chemotherapeutic drugs because drug delivery to these regions is suboptimal. Because a cancer therapeutic agent must not leave significant clusters of viable cells within any lesion to achieve a clinically meaningful effect, the poorly vascularized regions of tumors represent a major obstacle to effective treatment.
One of the most important recent developments in tumor biology is the recognition that neoangiogenesis is essential for the growth of tumors to clinically meaningful sizes (2). What is less well recognized is that this neoangiogenesis often does not keep pace with the growth of the neoplastic cells, resulting in large necrotic areas composed of dead or dying cells. For example, we found that each of 20 randomly selected liver metastases >1 cm3 in size contained relatively large avascular regions, in general constituting 25–75% of the tumor mass (Fig. 1). Importantly, cells adjacent to these necrotic areas are poorly vascularized and likely to be difficult to treat with conventional agents.
,br>
In the work described here we attempted to exploit the fact that necrotic regions exist only within tumors and not in normal tissues. We wished to develop a toxic agent that could be specifically delivered to these areas and, in theory, could kill surrounding viable tumor cells. We chose to investigate anaerobic bacteria for this purpose. It has been recognized for half a century that such bacteria could selectively proliferate in the hypoxic regions of tumors (3–18). Clever strategies for potentially exploiting such bacteria for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes have been devised, although relatively little work in this area has recently taken place. We hoped that a systematic screen for appropriate anaerobic bacteria that could kill tumor cells adjacent to the poorly vascularized regions, rather than just localize to such regions, would rejuvenate interest in this approach. Furthermore, we hoped that chemotherapeutic agents that killed the well vascularized regions of tumors, when administered in conjunction with appropriate bacteria, would result in the destruction of a major proportion of neoplastic cells within the tumors. Our progress toward realizing these goals is described below.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Growth. The bacterial strains tested in this study were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and are listed in Table 1. All bacteria except Lactobacilli were grown anaerobically in liquid cultures at 37°C in Reinforced Clostridial Medium (RCM) (Difco). Lactobacilli were grown in Lactobacilli MRS broth (Difco). Intravenous injections of bacteria generally included 5 × 107 bacteria suspended in 0.5 ml Dulbecco's PBS (Life Technologies). Mice that received injections of Bifidobacteria were also given i.p. injections of lactulose daily for 5 days to increase bacterial growth (16). Intratumoral injections of bacteria generally included 1 × 107 bacteria suspended in 0.1 ml of PBS.
Drugs. Dolastatin-10 (D10) was provided by George R. Pettit (Cancer Research Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ), Gregory P. Kalemkerian (Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit), and Robert J. Schultz (Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda). Combretastatin A-4 was kindly provided by Robert J. Schultz. Cytoxan (CTX), mitomycin C (MMC), vincristine, colchicine, and vinblastine are commercially available chemotherapeutic agents (Sigma).
,br>
Cell Lines and Animals. Female athymic nude and C57BŁ6 mice 6–8 weeks of age were purchased from Harlan (Indianapolis). HCT116 colon cancer cells and B16 melanoma cells were grown as monolayers in McCoy 5A medium (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) supplemented with 5% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (catalog no. 15140-122).
Sporulation and Generation of a Nontoxigenic C. novyi Strain. Spores of Clostridium novyi strains were generated by growing the organisms anaerobically at 37°C, pH 7.4 in a medium containing 5 g Na2HPO4, 30 g peptone, 0.5 g L-cysteine, 10 g maltose, and 5% wt/vol dried cooked meat particles (Difco) per 1 liter. After 1 week in this medium, spores settled in the cooked meat particle layer (19). Spores were further purified from contaminating vegetative forms on a discontinuous Percoll gradient. To remove the lethal toxin gene from the wild-type C. novyi strain, C. novyi spores were heated at 70°C for 15 min to inactivate the phage carrying the toxin (20, 21). The spores were then plated on reinforced clostridial medium agar and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 h. Isolated colonies were cultured in liquid RCM for another 24 to 48 h and then tested for the presence of the lethal toxin gene by PCR.
In Vivo Studies. Six to eight week old female BALB/c athymic nude or C57BŁ6 mice were implanted with s.c. tumors through the injection of 2.5 × 106 HCT116 or B16 cells, respectively. After 8–12 days of tumor establishment, treatment was initiated with spores or drugs. Screening of bacterial strains for their ability to populate tumor grafts was done by either intratumoral injection (100 μl volume, 1 × 107 bacteria) or i.v. injection (500 μl volume, 5 × 107 bacteria or spores) into the tail vein. C. novyi-NT spores and D10 were diluted to the appropriate concentration in PBS and then administered by i.v. injection in a volume of 500 μl. CTX and MMC were diluted in PBS and then given by i.p. injection in a volume of 500 μl. Tumor growth was assessed by measuring the size of the major and minor axes of s.c. tumors every 2 and every 4 days for B16 and HCT116 tumors, respectively, using calipers. Tumor volume was then calculated by using the equation length × width2 × 0.5.>br>
Results
Choice Of Bacterial Species. From previous studies it was clear that species of anaerobic bacteria could grow within the hypoxic regions of tumors. An example is provided by Bifidobacterium longum, which, when injected intravenously into mice with s.c. tumors, grew specifically and robustly within the tumors but not within normal tissues (16, 17). Gram stains of sections of the tumors, however, revealed that most bacteria were tightly clustered within colonies rather than distributed throughout the necrotic regions (Fig. 2 A and B). As we considered dispersion of the bacteria essential to achieve the desired effects, numerous anaerobic species of three different genera were tested in an effort to find one(s) exhibiting this phenotype (Table 1). For this purpose, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus strains were injected intravenously, whereas Clostridium strains, which are generally highly toxic when injected intravenously, were injected directly into tumors. Among the 26 strains listed in Table 1, only two (C. novyi and C. sordellii) exhibited extensive spreading throughout the poorly vascularized portions of the tumors (data not shown). Although this spread was undoubtedly facilitated by the motile nature of these two species, other motile anaerobic bacteria, including other Clostridium strains, did not exhibit this property when tested under identical conditions.
Infiltration of the Tumor Mass Following i.v. Injection of C. novyi Spores. For an experimental therapy to represent a potentially viable tool for the treatment of disseminated cancers, it must have the capacity to be delivered systemically rather than through local, intratumoral injection. Although live bacteria are often toxic when injected intravenously, it has been shown that bacterial spores are nontoxic to normal animals. Accordingly, we found that large numbers (up to 108 in a volume of 500 μl) of C. novyi and C. sordellii spores could be injected intravenously into normal mice without causing any noticeable side effects. When intravenously injected into mice with s.c. B16 tumors, however, C. novyi bacteria floridly germinated within the tumors within 16 h (Fig. 2C). In contrast, no germinated bacteria were observed in the liver, spleen, kidney, lung, or brain of these mice (data not shown). Similar results were observed after i.v. injection of C. sordellii spores (data not shown).
Genetic Modification of C. novyi. Although C. novyi and C. sordellii spores both had the capacity to grow within tumors and kill some surrounding tumor cells, there was at least one “small” problem encountered with this experimental treatment: 16–18 h following the initiation of treatment, all of the mice died. We suspected that the cause of death was the release of potent lethal toxins from the bacteria germinating within the tumors. Indeed, other anaerobic bacterial spores have proved highly toxic to animals and humans following germination within the anaerobic environments present in tumors or wounds, and the resultant mortality was shown to be due to specific secreted toxins (22–26).
To mitigate systemic toxicity, we attempted to eliminate the lethal toxin gene from C. novyi. We chose C. novyi rather than C. sordellii for this purpose because the latter has two homologous toxin genes (27) rather than one and because the single C. novyi toxin gene is located within a phage episome (20, 21, 28). Bacteria were heat treated to induce loss of the phage and inoculated onto agar plates. Of 400 bacterial colonies screened, three were observed to have lost the toxin gene when assessed by PCR using toxin gene-specific primers (examples in Fig. 3). Phospholipase C, a C. novyi gene contained within the bacterial rather than the phage genome (29), served as control for this PCR experiment. One clone, named C. novyi-NT, that had lost the toxin gene was selected for further analysis.
Destruction of Tumor Cells Following Injection of C. novyi-NT Spores. C. novyi-NT spores devoid of the lethal toxin were injected intravenously into mice with tumors. These spores retained their capacity to germinate within tumors and resulted in greatly expanded areas of necrosis (Fig. 4 A vs. B). However, these spores, unlike those of their parents, were nontoxic when injected alone, with no ill effects generally observed after injection of up to 108 spores into mice with tumors. In contrast, all mice died after injection of 5 × 107 parental C. novyi spores into mice with tumors. Growing bacteria could be observed throughout the much-enlarged necrotic regions of tumors after injection of spores (data not shown). The enlargement of the necrotic regions was apparently due to the destruction of viable tumor cells adjacent to the original necrotic regions by the bacteria. Indeed, a bacterial “film” (30) was routinely observed at the interface between the necrotic area and the remaining viable rim of the tumor, as if the bacteria were destroying the viable tumor cells and using its degradation products as nutrients (data not shown). This tumor infiltration effect was similar to that observed with wild-type C. novyi bacteria (Fig. 2D).
Combination Therapy. As noted in the introduction, we hoped to combine a bacterial agent with more conventional chemotherapeutic agents in an effort to attack the tumors from both the inside and outside, respectively. Following preliminary investigations with several such agents, we concentrated on two classes: (i) DNA damaging agents, such as MMC and CTX, that selectively kill tumor cells, and (ii) agents that appear to partially collapse tumor vasculature, such as flavone acetic acid derivatives and microtubule binding agents (31, 32). The latter class of agents has been shown to be able to interfere with proper circulation through the tumors and thereby trap large molecules, such as antibodies or bacteria, that have gained access to the tumor tissue (33–35). Among flavone acetic acid and the microtubule-binding agents tested (including vinblastine, vincristine, colchicine, combretastatin A-4, and D10), D10 appeared to have the most pronounced effects and was chosen for further experimentation.
Xenografts of the colorectal cancer cell line HCT116 were used to test the effects of this combination therapy in nude mice because the tumors could easily be visualized under the hairless skin. As shown in Fig. 5, sequential treatment with C. novyi-NT spores, D10, and MMC resulted in dramatic effects on large s.c. tumors, easily observable through the skin. Twenty four hours after the injection of C. novyi-NT spores, the tumor mass swelled and became edematous (Fig. 5A). Six hours after receiving D10, a black spot developed near the center of the tumor, representing an area of hemorrhagic necrosis. This spot expanded in size and within 24 h often completely enveloped the tumor (Fig. 5A, 1 day). Hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) staining of sections of these tumors revealed extensive destruction of the tumors, often accompanied by infiltration of inflammatory cells (data not shown). These necrotic masses then shrank over a period of 2–4 weeks (Fig. 5A, 14–30 days). In many mice, these necrotic masses eventually dissolved and disappeared, leaving the animals tumor-free (Fig. 5B; quantified below). Similar, although less dramatic, results were observed following the sequential treatment with C. novyi-NT and D10 (without MMC), but never with D10 and MMC in the absence of C. novyi-NT and rarely with C. novyi-NT alone.
The dramatic antineoplastic effects of this combination bacteriolytic therapy (COBALT) were associated with significant toxicity. Approximately 15% of animals with tumors of 350 mm3 in size died within 24–72 h of receiving COBALT. This toxicity was clearly related to the size of the tumors, because ≈45% of animals with larger tumors (≈700 mm3) died. Deaths were not observed after administration of C. novyi-NT spores alone or with chemotherapy alone. Although the reason for the deaths of these animals was not clear, they may have been due to tumor lysis syndrome, a phenomenon previously observed in the clinic when large tumor burdens are rapidly destroyed by antineoplastic agents (see Discussion).
The antineoplastic effects of COBALT were quantified in the experiments shown in Fig. 6. Animals with relatively large s.c. HCT116 tumors (starting tumor volume ≈700 mm3) were treated with drugs alone (D10 plus MMC) or C. novyi-NT spores plus the drugs. As can be seen in Fig. 6A, the drugs alone slowed the growth of the tumors, although the tumors continued to grow and the animals had to be killed at 10–14 days, when tumor weights exceeded 10% of body weight. The addition of C. novyi-NT spores dramatically enhanced the effects of treatment, with tumors actually shrinking rather than simply slowing. In the experiment shown in Fig. 6A, seven of eight animals had dramatic tumor regressions after only one administration of COBALT, and four of the five animals that survived the therapy were completely cured, with no evidence of tumor regrowth after a further three months time. Significant tumor shrinkage was also seen when mice were given sequential treatment with C. novyi-NT spores plus D10 (Fig. 6B). However, there was no long-term tumor-free survival and the treatment had to be repeated once every 2 weeks unless the full combination, including MMC, was included. This repetition was associated with additional toxicity, including deaths of ≈15% of animals with each dose. The full COBALT regimen was therefore preferred on the basis of increased efficacy and reduced overall toxicity.
To determine whether COBALT would affect other tumor types, we treated C57BŁ6 mice with large syngeneic B16 tumors. In this case, CTX was substituted for MMC, because B16 tumor cells were more sensitive to CTX than to MMC. The drugs alone had some antitumor effects, as expected, although the tumor continued to grow in size and the animals had to be killed within 1 week after beginning therapy (Fig. 6C). C. novyi-NT spores considerably enhanced these effects: the tumors were observed to shrink rather than simply enlarge at a slower rate (Fig. 6C). D10 plus C. novyi-NT spores (without CTX) had significant antineoplastic effects on B16 tumors, but the addition of the tumor cytotoxic agent (CTX) further enhanced the efficacy of COBALT (Fig. 6C). In the B16 tumor model, maintenance COBALT (once weekly) was required to keep the tumors from regrowing, whereas with HCT116 cells a single treatment cured about half the mice.
Discussion:
The results recorded above show that COBALT can result in rapid and dramatic regressions of experimental tumors in mice. Even relatively large tumors could be treated successfully with COBALT, although tumors of the size used in our experiments do not generally respond well to chemotherapeutic agents (Figs. 5 and 6).
It is also clear that many questions remain. For example, the basis for the potent tumor cell killing in the vicinity of the germinating bacteria is not understood. We found that many other bacterial strains could germinate within the necrotic regions of tumors but did not exhibit this potent cytotoxic activity. This killing is clearly not due to the lethal toxin gene of C. novyi, because this gene was deleted in the C. novyi-NT strain used in COBALT. It will be interesting in the future to determine which of the C. novyi-NT genes are responsible for these tumor cytolytic effects.
Another point of interest was that an agent acting on the vasculature (D10) considerably enhanced the ability of C. novyi-NT spores to lyse tumors. Presumably, the vascular collapse further lowered the oxygen tension near the trapped bacteria and thereby increased the potential for bacterial growth. Indeed it has been demonstrated that vascular collapsing agents can increase the germination of bacterial spores in tumors (33). D10 was given after the bacterial spores rather than before because we believed that partial vascular collapse before spore administration might have a deleterious effect on spore delivery. This belief was based on the fact that other vascular collapsing agents, such as 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid and combretastatin A-4, have been shown to exert their effects in combination with radioactively labeled antibodies only when administered after, and not before, the antibodies (34, 35).
Several obstacles remain before COBALT can be realistically considered for clinical trials. For example, the range of tumors in which COBALT might be successful has not yet been addressed. Although the first two tumor models we investigated (xenografts of HCT116 colorectal cancer cells and syngeneic B16 melanoma cells) were effectively treated, preliminary experiments show that not all tumors are equally susceptible to COBALT. Greater understanding of the basis for C. novyi-NT tumor cell killing should provide insights into this issue. Additionally, different tumor types may require different chemotherapeutic agents to achieve maximal effects in combination with C. Novy-NT. Another issue concerns the size of the tumors to be treated. They must be large enough to have outgrown their blood supply and contain necrotic regions. We do not believe this factor will be limiting for many human tumor situations, as the great majority of clinically apparent human tumors contain large necrotic regions (Fig. 1). However, micrometastatic disease might not be suitable for COBALT. At the other end of the spectrum, COBALT-mediated lysis of large tumors was associated with significant toxicity. Although the basis for this toxicity is not yet known, it could have been due to efflux of toxic bacterial products from the tumors or due to “tumor lysis syndrome.” It has previously been noted that the rapid lysis of very large tumor burdens is associated with systemic toxicity in humans treated with chemotherapy, perhaps due to the sudden efflux of tumor cell metabolites, such as calcium, phosphate, and uric acid, into the circulation (36). Although tumor lysis syndrome can be controlled in humans, it is difficult to control in mice. Any therapy which dramatically shrinks tumors may be subject to this side effect.
One of the encouraging observations made in our study is that a subset of tumors completely regressed after even a single dose of COBALT. Additionally, the C. novyi-NT spores themselves were completely nontoxic to normal mice. The COBALT concept could easily be extended and improved, with different combinations of chemotherapeutic agents to suit particular tumor types. Additionally, it may be possible to genetically manipulate the C. novyi-NT to enhance their potency or selectivity. Further studies along these lines seem warranted.
Jain en Forber bekritiseren de studie met COBALT en lijkt zinnig dit te lezen.
Can engineered bacteria help control cancer?
Rakesh K. Jain* and Neil S. Forbes
Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
* To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: jain@steele.mgh.harvard.edu.
Hypoxia and anoxia are pathophysiologic characteristics of most solid tumors (1, 2). For nearly 150 years, nonpathogenic, anaerobic bacteria that preferentially localize and proliferate in the hypoxic regions of tumors have been investigated as treatments for experimental and human tumors with mixed success (Table 1). In recent years, there has been a renewed interest in using these bacteria as innovative delivery vehicles for gene therapy (Table 1). Now, as described in this issue of PNAS, Vogelstein and coworkers (11) have created a new strain of anaerobic bacteria, devoid of its toxic genes, that leads to dramatic and prolonged regression of subcutaneous tumors when systematically administered with conventional drugs. This strategy, referred to as combination bacteriolytic therapy (COBALT), adds a new weapon in the war against cancer. However, there are still obstacles that need to be overcome before it can be used safely in the clinic.
Ironically, a tumor's metabolically compromised microenvironment provides a haven for a number of anaerobic bacteria.
In tumors, blood vessels are structurally and functionally abnormal, resulting in temporally and spatially heterogeneous blood flow (19, 20). This heterogeneity hinders the delivery of blood-borne therapeutics to all cancer cells and leads to acutely and/or chronically hypoxic and acidic regions in tumors (Fig. 1). These conditions reduce the effectiveness of radiation and some chemotherapeutic agents and select for cancer cells that are more aggressive, metastatic, and resistant to various therapies (2, 21).
Ironically, a tumor's metabolically compromised microenvironment provides a haven for a number of anaerobic bacteria. And indeed, over the past 50 years, several strains of facultative and obligate anaerobic bacteria have been shown to localize and cause lysis in transplanted tumors in animals (Table 1). These initial animal studies were so encouraging that clinical trials using Clostridium began in the 1960s (8). Unfortunately, the results were not as impressive as anticipated and the trials were discontinued.
So why is there a resurgence of interest in using bacteria to treat solid tumors? To answer this question we need to examine the criteria for an ideal anticancer bacterium.
They should be: (i) nontoxic to the host; (ii) only able to replicate within the tumor; (iii) motile and able to disperse evenly throughout a tumor (including hypoxic and necrotic regions); (iv) slowly and completely eliminated from the host; (v) nonimmunogenic; and (vi) able to cause lysis of tumor cells by direct competition for nutrients, localized production of cytotoxins, or production of therapeutic amplifiers.
In the last decade, significant progress has been made on each of these fronts. Multiple approaches have been used to remove the toxin genes of bacteria (16, 17). For instance, Dang et al. (11) used heat shock to eliminate the lethal toxin genes from Clostridium novyi, located within a phage episome. Modern molecular approaches might be used once genome sequences of various strains of bacteria become available (22, 23). Of course, the use of naturally nonpathogenic bacteria (e.g., Clostridium oncolyticum) might avoid the toxicity problem altogether. Additionally, techniques developed to transfer genetic material into bacteria other than Escherichia coli, for example the anaerobic bacteria Clostridium acetobutylicum (24) and Bifidobacterium longum (25), have the potential to modulate the toxicity, motility, and protein expression of therapeutic bacteria.
Currently there are no rapid, reliable, and inexpensive methods to screen for an ideal bacterium. Dang et al. (11) screened 26 strains of bacteria for their ability to spread evenly throughout poorly vascularized regions of tumors. The selected bacteria were seen growing throughout the enlarged necrotic regions of tumors after systemic injection of spores. Apparently, the bacteria were destroying the viable cells at the interface of the necrotic region, and using the degradation products as nutrients. However, this treatment did not eradicate the tumor completely, leaving a ring of viable cells at the tumor periphery. To kill cells in the viable ring, Dang et al. chose to combine the bacteriolytic therapy with low molecular weight conventional chemotherapy (mitomycin C and cytoxan). Their rationale was that the bacteria would lyse the tumors from the inside out, and low molecular weight chemotherapeutic agents would attack cancer cells in the well-perfused, non-necrotic region, a concept used since 1964 (7) (Table 1).
To enhance the effect of chemotherapeutics (mitomycin C and cytoxan) and bacteria, Dang et al. used dolastatin (D-10), an antivascular agent. To our knowledge, this is the first time antivascular therapy has been combined with bacteriolytic therapy. The benefit of this addition to COBALT, as described by Dang et al., is that vascular stasis increases the extent of hypoxia thereby increasing the size of the region affected by C. novyi. It appears that this combination is the predominant reason for the effectiveness of COBALT. A problem with the low molecular weight chemotherapeutics is that they are rapidly cleared from perfused regions (i.e., the viable ring) (26). The additional benefit of including antivascular agents that lead to vascular shutdown is that they can trap extravasated molecules in tumors (27), thereby enhancing exposure to therapeutic agents in combination therapy.
Indeed, COBALT therapy did produce impressive results. Dang et al. treated two different tumor lines grown subcutaneously in mice and observed regression in most tumors and complete cure in a considerable proportion of mice that survived. Whether similar cure rates can be achieved with COBALT in orthotopic and spontaneous tumors needs to be examined.
Besides COBALT, there are several other strategies that amplify bacteriolytic therapy. One of these is to engineer bacteria to produce inflammatory cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor α) that increase the sensitivity of tumors to radiation therapy and/or evoke a host immune response (28). Another approach is bacteria-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (BDEPT), a variation of antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT). In this approach, targeting bacteria are engineered to produce enzymes that can activate prodrugs within the tumor (9, 29). Another possibility is to place the genes of prodrug-activating enzymes under the control of radiation-inducible promoters to provide spatial and temporal control, thus enabling selective killing of tumor cells while sparing normal cells (28, 30).
So what are the potential problems with bacteriolytic therapy? First, there is the immediate problem encountered by Dang et al.: toxicity. Even after removing the toxin genes, COBALT therapy led to ~15–45% mortality in mice. Whether this is caused by the so-called tumor lysis syndrome (31) or the efflux of toxic bacterial products is not known. Identification of the toxins released by rapidly lysing tumors or by large colonies of Clostridium contained within tumors is essential for alleviating the toxicity. Toxins expressed by the bacteria may be identified after complete sequencing of the respective genomes. Well-known strategies then can be used to tackle specific toxins. On the other hand, alleviating the toxicity from low molecular weight byproducts of dying cells will require careful control of the rate of tumor lysis.
Once the issues of systemic toxicity and incomplete tumor lysis are addressed, there are other potential pitfalls that may impede the success of COBALT therapy in the clinic. The most significant of these is acquired drug resistance, which lowers the effectiveness of the standard chemotherapeutics used in COBALT after repeated treatment. Even new drugs such as Gleevec are facing this age-old problem (32). However, antiangiogenic and antivascular agents may be less susceptible to this type of resistance (21, 33). Combined bacteriolytic antiangiogenesis therapy (COMBAT) may, thus, overcome or circumvent the problem of drug resistance.
A third and more difficult problem is that of treating small non-necrotic metastases of large primary tumors. The current strategy is to treat metastases as early as possible with conventional chemotherapeutics before the onset of physiological and/or multidrug resistance. COBALT would require one to wait until the metastases develop hypoxic/necrotic regions. Because metastasis is the major cause of mortality from cancer (34), we wonder whether it would be possible to engineer bacteria that can localize in small orthotopic tumors and their spontaneous metastases that do not contain large hypoxic regions? Such bacteria would not only facilitate treatment of metastases but also their early detection by using molecular imaging techniques.
References and adresses for more information at this page in Pubmed
Chemokuren en effect op kanker: 10 oktober 2004: Der Spiegel geeft aan in groot wetenschappelijk artikel compleet met statistieken enz. dat chemokuren niets toevoegen aan overlevingstijd van kankerpatiënten met solide tumoren , bij borstkanker is er zelfs iets meer sterfte ondanks chemokuren enz. Alles gebaseerd op studie onderzoek vanaf 1977.
10 oktober 2004: Bron: Der Spiegel
In het forum van onze site werden we attent gemaakt op dit bericht door MB, waarvoor dank. MB maakte voor ons een Nederlandse samenvatting van het artikel uit Der Spiegel, waarvoor nogmaals hartelijk dank. Eerst per 13 optober 2004 geplaatst de samenvatting van MB en ook commentaar van ons eraan toegevoegd, met aanvullend een Duitstalig artikel uit een Oostenrijkse krant over onderzoek van Hölzel:
MB maakte voor ons deze samenvatting en vertaling van het Duitstalige artikel in Der Spiegel.
Gifkuur zonder nut
Epidemioloog Diet Hoelzel (note MB: als je op internet kijkt onder www.krebsinfo.de zie je dat hij statistieken heeft gemaakt w.b. borstkanker voor geheel Duitsland en Duitsland is groot), werkzaam in kliniek Grosshadern, de universiteitskliniek van Muenchen, heeft alle dossiers vanaf 1978 van gemetasteerde borst-, prostaat-, long- en darmkanker patienten bestudeerd. Hij kwam tot de conclusie dat de afgelopen 25 jaren geen vooruitgang is geboekt in de overlevingstijd en dat deze bij borstkanker patienten zelfs is afgenomen.
Sinds tientallen jaren worden nieuwe cytostatica gebruikt die langer leven zouden geven. De farmacie schermt zelfs met uitspraken als “Taxotere- kans tot overlevingstijd” en “Taxol- het leven een toekomst geven”. Echter de harde getallen laten iets anders zien: de mediaantijd van overleven is voor borstkankerpatienten van 1978 tot 2002 afgenomen van 24 maanden naar 22 maanden, prostaatkanker: 19 maanden naar 18 maanden, longkanker toegenomen van 5 naar 6 maanden en darmkanker 12 maanden naar 14 maanden. Dit geldt echter niet voor vele andere kankers of chemo’s die gegeven worden voordat er geopereerd wordt.
Verder geeft hij aan dat in klinische studies alleen nog maar de ene chemo tegen die andere wordt afgezet en dat er geen controlegroepen zijn die alleen een placebo krijgen. Om op de markt te komen zijn kleine groepen met positieve resultaten soms al voldoende en de resultaten worden “statistisch significant” genoemd. Deze middelen kunnen niet als onschuldig betiteld worden; een van de eerste cytostatica hadden binnen een paar weken enkele patienten gedood echter ook de andere cytostatica lieten patienten vaak door een hel gaan. Langzaam ging bij enkele artsen het belletje rinkelen dat cytostatica alleen maar tijdelijk tumoren laten krimpen (note MB: dit heet complete of gedeeltelijke respons, samen objectieve respons).In September 1985 vertelde de inmiddels gestorven Klaus Thomson, destijds directeur gynaecologie universiteitskliniek Hamburg-Eppendorf, tijdens een internationaal congres in Berlijn: ”Het zou ons tot nadenken moeten zetten dat steeds meer artsen zeggen: voor mij niet zo’n therapie”. Tien jaar later trok de epidemioloog Ulrich Abel van de universiteits kliniek Heidelberg het nut van chemo in twijfel. Een jaar lang heeft hij 1000 publicaties bestudeerd en vastgesteld dat bij de meeste orgaankankers (solide tumoren) er geen bewijzen zijn (ook zeker niet voor de hoge dosis therapie) dat het de overlevingstijd verlengt of betere levenskwaliteit geeft.
Bekende oncologen beaamden dit. Echter, iedereen is tevreden met chemo, de arts kan wat geven, de patient krijgt z’n “medicijn” en de farmacie verdient goud geld, niet alleen aan de chemo’s maar ook aan al die medicijnen om de nevenwerkingen te verminderen. De Düsseldorfse vrouwenarts, Jaeger, zou dit geld graag bestemd zien voor vroeg diagnostiek. Van 1996 tot 2004 is de omzet van cytostatica wereldwijd gestegen van 5,93 miljard US dollar naar 16,11 miljard US dollar.
Antilichamen, die gericht kankercellen kunnen herkennen, de nieuwste erg dure medicijnen, die een doorbraak zouden zijn, blijken ook niet eenduidig langere levensverwachtingen te geven. Echter deze nieuwe medicijnen zorgen er wel voor dat de oude cytostatica nog agressiever op de markt worden gezet (note MB: zie Taxol). Nog steeds komen er nieuwe cytostatica , of mengsels van cytostatica, op de markt die een langere overlevingstijd zouden geven. Echter “statistisch opvallende verschillen” blijken te berusten op toeval. De voorstanders van chemo wijzen vooral op twee onderzoeken, een afkomstig van Franse onderzoekers en de andere afkomstig van de Universiteit van Houston.
Beide onderzoeken werden weerlegd door Hölzer doordat twee ongelijke groepen met elkaar vergeleken werden. Bij de Fransen was de tweede groep een groep met patienten met uitgezaaide borstkanker in een vroeger stadium (van 1994-2000 werd dit sneller vastgesteld). Dat deze patienten dus lager leefden kwam niet door de verbeterde chemo, maar doordat ze minder ver in hun ziekte zaten.
Volgens de onderzoekers van Houston verbeterde de 5 jaars overleving van gemetasteerde borstkanker patiënten van 1974-2000 van 10% naar 44%. Ze lieten zien dat dit door de cytostatica kwam. Echter in deze studie werden vrouwen met en zonder metastasen met elkaar vergeleken. In een onopvallende zin schrijven de onderzoekers dat de recentere groep patienten bevatte die een gunstiger prognose profiel hadden.
MB
Hier een bericht uit andere krant die aandacht geeft aan het epidemologisch onderzoek van Dieter Hölzel dat voor grote beroering zorgt vooral in het Duits sprekende deel van de wereld, zoals hier een krant in Oostenrijk. Op internet zie je ook artsen en oncologen over elkaar heenvallen om zich maar te verdedigen, maar wie het artikel in Der Spiegel leest ziet dat Dieter Hölzel, ook als regulier arts en onderzoeker werkzaam overigens, alle kritiek of verzachtende verklaringen kan weerleggen en blijft keihard staan wat hij onderzocht: in 25 jaar heeft chemo of welke andere behandeling of middelen dan ook niets veranderd aan de gemiddelde overlevingstijd van een kankerpatient woonachtig in Munchen en omgeving, maar geldt wellicht voor de hele wereld, aangezien duizenden en duizenden kankerpatiënten zijn gevolgd en tientallen onderzoeken zijn geanalyseerd.
De kosten wereldwijd van alleen al chemokuren zijn inmiddels in omzet gestegen van US $ 5,93 milliard in 1996 naar US $ 16,11 milliard in 2004. Het effect op gemiddelde overleving bij de vier grootste orgaankankersoorten darmkanker, prostaatkanker, borstkanker en longkanker zijn hetzelfde gebleven en voor borstkanker zelfs iets gedaald. Hier een artikel uit een Oostenrijkse krant over het artikel uit Der Spiegel, waar anderen de gelegenheid krijgen het ongeljik van Hölzer aan te tonen, maar wie het artikel in Der Spiegel leest ziet dat Hölzer alle kritiek gemakkelijk weerlegt.
Chemotherapie: Im Krebs-Gang
Bei Krebs in fortgeschrittenem Stadium sind in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten nur vereinzelt Verbesserungen bei der Überlebenszeit gelungen. Immerhin stieg die Lebensqualität der Patienten deutlich an. Doch nun droht mit neuen, teureren Präparaten der Finanzkollaps.
Wenn es der Münchener Epidemiologe Dieter Hölzel, 62, darauf angelegt hatte, die Zunft der Krebsmediziner aufs Äußerste zu provozieren, so hätte er dafür keine passenderen Reizwörter finden können: Sie trieben zwar einen enormen Aufwand für Medikamente, Chemo- oder Strahlentherapie, und das bei Preisen, die das Gesundheitssystem an den Rand des Ruins treiben würden, kritisierte der Professor. Nur: Erreicht werde damit aber reichlich wenig. Patienten mit Krebs im fortgeschrittenen Stadium würden heute nicht länger leben als vor 25 Jahren, im Gegenteil: „Ich befürchte, dass die systematische Ausweitung der Chemotherapie gerade bei Brustkrebs für den Rückgang der Überlebensraten verantwortlich sein könnte.“
„Giftkur ohne Nutzen“ betitelte der „Spiegel“ in der Vorwoche diese harsche Systemkritik und löste damit auch unter Österreichs Medizinern heftige Reaktionen aus. „Das ist die Sichtweise eines Statistikers, der von der Realität in den Kliniken keine Ahnung hat“, schimpft etwa Heinz Ludwig, Krebsspezialist am Wiener Wilhelminenspital.
Auch Hellmut Samonigg, Chefonkologe der Medizinischen Universitätsklinik Graz, zeigt für Hölzels Offensive wenig Verständnis: „Er schmeißt bei seinen Daten Äpfel und Birnen zusammen. Aber er kann gerne mal kommen und einer frisch operierten Patientin, die kurz vor der Chemotherapie steht, seine Ansichten nahe bringen. Das ist ja wirklich wenig hilfreich, was da von ihm kommt.“
Dieter Hölzel ist derart heftige Reaktionen gewohnt. Und er weiß, dass er mit seinen Angriffen in ein Wespennest sticht. „In diesem existenziellen Bereich, wo es um Leben und Tod geht, ist man rasch der Unruhestifter, wenn man Regulierungen fordert. Aber es ist die Pflicht – auch der Krebsmedizin – über ihre wirklichen Leistungen Rechenschaft abzulegen“, findet Hölzel. Er habe einfach die Nase voll von dieser Überheblichkeit, wo sich die Experten gegenseitig auf die Schulter klopfen und sich zu ihren tollen Leistungen gratulieren, weil wieder eine hochspezielle Studie fertig ist. Draußen in den Kliniken, bei den ganz normalen Patienten, finde der Alltag statt, mahnt er. Doch sobald die ersten Metastasen in der Krankenakte notiert werden, habe der medizinische Fortschritt laut Daten des Münchener Krebsregisters rasch ein Ende. „Und ich glaube nicht, dass das daran liegt, dass die bayrischen Ärzte so viel weniger von ihrem Handwerk verstehen als die Österreicher.“
Überlebenschancen. Die großen Killertumoren Darm-, Lungen-, Brust- und Prostatakrebs sind für etwa die Hälfte aller Krebstodesfälle verantwortlich. Während die Sterblichkeit bei Darmkrebs bei beiden Geschlechtern auf hohem Niveau stagniert, steigt sie beim Prostatakrebs der Männer und beim Lungenkrebs der Frauen rasant an. Hölzel fügte dieser Grobstatistik nun noch Details hinzu, die er aus der genauen Analyse tausender Krebsfälle gewonnen hat. Im Münchener Tumorregister steht nämlich nicht nur der isolierte Todesfall. Auch der Zeitpunkt der Erstdiagnose, ein eventuelles Wiederauftreten des Tumors und die Metastasierung sind dort penibel verzeichnet.
Daraus errechnete der Epidemiologe, dass sich in Bayern die Überlebenszeiten bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs in den vergangenen 25 Jahren sogar verringert haben. Überlebte früher die Hälfte der Patientinnen länger als 24 Monate, so liegt diese „Halbwertszeit“ nun bei nur noch 22 Monaten. Ähnlich schlecht steht es beim Prostatakrebs, wo der Wert von 19 auf 18 Monate zurückging. Lediglich beim Darmkrebs (zwölf auf 14 Monate) und beim Speedkiller Lungenkrebs (früher war nach fünf Monaten die Hälfte der Patienten tot, jetzt erst nach sechs Monaten) geht der Trend ein wenig in die Gegenrichtung.
„Diese Zahlen sprechen den Deutschen ein besonders schlechtes Zeugnis aus“, urteilt Christoph Zielinski, Krebsmediziner am Wiener AKH, „die österreichischen Daten sind völlig konträr.“ Zielinski schwärmt von der vorbildlichen Zusammenarbeit der verschiedenen Krebsdisziplinen, von der hohen Forschungsdichte, dem Zugang zu modernsten Medikamenten für die in Studien eingebundenen Patienten und die ständige Qualitätskontrolle auf höchstem Niveau. Bei der Frage nach konkreten Belegen für seine positive Sicht der Dinge verweist er auf „sehr ausführliche Daten“ des Epidemiologen Christian Vutuc.
Schlechte Daten. Der hingegen kommt ein wenig ins Stocken, als er von der geradezu euphorischen Schilderung der hiesigen Verhältnisse erfährt. „Das Problem ist nur, dass wir relativ schlechtes Zahlenmaterial von den Patientenakten haben. Damit brauchen wir bei den angesehenen Medizinjournalen gar nicht vorstellig werden. Das genügt nicht den internationalen Standards.“ Nur bei Brustkrebs reichten die Fallzahlen, und die Patientendokumentation entsprach den Qualitätskriterien. Doch die Ergebnisse dieser 2002 publizierten Studie ähneln verdächtig jenen der Münchener. Zwar sank die Sterberate im Vergleich zum Ende der achtziger Jahre um insgesamt 3,3 Prozent, dies ist jedoch vor allem auf starke Verbesserungen bei den lokal begrenzten, gut behandelbaren Tumoren ohne Lymphknotenbefall zurückzuführen. Sobald Metastasen auftreten, kehrt sich der Trend hingegen auch in Österreich um. „Bei Frauen im Alter unter 50 Jahren hat im Vergleichszeitraum die Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit sogar um 17 Prozent abgenommen“, konstatiert der Wiener Epidemiologe.
Lungenkrebs. Beunruhigende Ergebnisse liefert auch der Sozialmediziner Ernest Groman in einer Studie zum durchschnittlichen Sterbealter von österreichischen Lungenkrebspatienten. Während die betroffenen Männer in den siebziger Jahren noch ein Durchschnittsalter von 69 Jahren erreichten, sank der Vergleichswert in der zweiten Hälfte der neunziger Jahre auf 68 Jahre ab. Und das, obwohl die allgemeine Lebenserwartung in dieser Zeitspanne um sechs Jahre gestiegen ist. Die Ursache für diese Verschlechterung ist nicht so klar zu orten. „Das kann ein Problem mit der Therapie sein“, sagt Groman, „das kann aber auch daran liegen, dass die Leute jetzt viel mehr rauchen. Oder dass sie die Light-Zigaretten stärker inhalieren.“ Genauere Aussagen sind aufgrund der schlechten Datenlage nicht möglich. Auch Groman weiß weder, wie lange die Patienten krank waren, noch, an welchem Tumortyp sie gelitten hatten. Deshalb kann er nur höchst allgemeine Hinweise geben: „Wir wissen, dass heute bei den jungen Leuten die Frauen schon mehr rauchen als die Männer. Und dass ein Patient mit Lungenkrebs im Schnitt eine Raucherkarriere von 40 Jahren hinter sich hat.“
Gültige Aussagen zur Therapie und hochwertige Kontrollstudien sind bei der extrem schlechten Datenlage jedoch nicht möglich. Einzig das Tiroler Krebsregister genießt einen halbwegs guten Ruf, die Fallzahlen aus Innsbruck reichen jedoch – speziell bei selteneren Tumoren – nicht aus, um daraus gültige Schlüsse zu ziehen. „Die Datenerhebung ist wirklich ein enormes Problem“, sagt Groman. „Der Widerwillen der Ärzte ist beträchtlich.“
„Kein Wunder“, assistiert Heinz Ludwig, „denn wir ersticken im Papierkrieg. Zwei von acht Arbeitsstunden wenden wir nur dafür auf, irgendwelche Zettel auszufüllen. Die Kollegen fühlen sich regelrecht missbraucht mit dem Verrechnungskram.“ Da bleibt naturgemäß auch die Motivation für eine standardisierte Patientendokumentation auf der Strecke. Sie ist aber die Grundvoraussetzung für eine funktionierende Qualitätskontrolle. Wenn aber damit den Medizinmathematikern erst die Munition geliefert wird, die Arbeit der Kliniker wie im Fall der Münchener Offensive hart zu kritisieren, so erhöht dies die Begeisterung der Ärzte erst recht nicht.
Insbesondere weil es auch eine ganze Reihe von Erfolgen der Krebsmedizin vorzuweisen gäbe. Bei Blutkrebsen, Lymphomen und bei Hodenkrebs beispielsweise lassen sich heute sensationelle Heilungsraten belegen, die noch bis vor wenigen Jahren undenkbar schienen. Dasselbe gilt für die unterstützende Verabreichung der Chemotherapie, meist im Anschluss an die chirurgische Entfernung des Tumors. Damit wird mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit das Auftreten von Metastasen gleich im Ansatz verhindert.
Revolution. Sobald allerdings Metastasen auftreten, verschiebt sich die Priorität – weg von der rein quantitativen Überlebenszeit, hin zu einer qualitativen Überlebenszeit. „Denn bei den meisten soliden Tumoren in diesem Stadium wird der Krebs zu einer chronischen Krankheit“, sagt der Grazer Onkologe Samonigg. „Wer anderes erzählt, redet Blödsinn.“
Gerade hier hat sich allerdings in den letzten Jahren die wahre Revolution in der Krebstherapie abgespielt. Elendes Siechtum am Infusionstropf mit Glatze und Speisack gehört glücklicherweise längst der Vergangenheit an. Die modernen Chemotherapeutika und auch die Begleitmedikamente erlauben es heute vielen Patienten, ein weit gehend normales Leben zu führen. Und je nach Tumorart stehen noch viele Lebensjahre bei guter Qualität bevor. „Wir haben Patienten, denen würden sie nichts anmerken. Die stehen voll im Leben, dabei haben sie das ganze Rückgrat voll mit Metastasen.“ Und darum, so Samonigg, gehe es in der modernen Krebstherapie. Wohl dosierte Chemotherapien, aber auch Hormonpräparate, Bestrahlung oder bestimmte Antikörper helfen, die gefürchteten Symptome der Krebserkrankung zu vermeiden: Bauchwasser, Darmverschlüsse oder unerträgliche Knochenschmerzen. „Im Zentrum der Therapie stehen immer die Patienten“, sagt der Wiener Onkologe Johannes Meran. „Es kommt darauf an, was sie erwarten und welches Risiko sie eingehen wollen. Und wir sind dazu da, die Patienten auf ihrem Weg zu beraten und mit gültigen Informationen zu versorgen.“
Schonende Therapie. Die 39-jährige Marion Hlawatschek hat vor beinahe drei Jahren von ihrer Diagnose Brustkrebs erfahren. Insgesamt hat sie in dieser Zeit bereits 21 Zyklen Chemotherapie hinter sich gebracht. Dazu bekommt sie jetzt seit fast einem Jahr das neue Hormonpräparat Herceptin. Bis auf die ersten Chemotherapien, „die wirklich ganz stark waren“, verlief die Behandlung für die Mutter eines zehnjährigen Kindes bisher erstaunlich schonend. Sie konnte sogar die meiste Zeit über arbeiten gehen. „Die letzte Chemotherapie bekam ich mit Tabletten. Das war so komplikationslos, die hätte ich ein ganzes Leben nehmen können.“ Nur leider ließ, wie bisher immer, die Wirkung der Mittel nach einer gewissen Zeit nach. Diesmal dauerte es nur drei Monate, bis die Tumorzellen gegen die Präparate resistent geworden waren. Jetzt wurden neue Metastasen in ihrer Lunge diagnostiziert. „Aber die Ärzte sagen, sie haben noch jede Menge neue Mittel, die ich noch nehmen kann – und das macht doch Mut“, sagt Hlawatschek.
Dass eine spontane Heilung unwahrscheinlich ist, weiß sie. „Ich hoffe halt, dass es eine zwar chronische, aber beherrschbare Krankheit bleibt. So lange wie möglich.“ Zum ersten Mal will sich die Wienerin nun auch nach unkonventionellen Methoden der Krebstherapie umsehen. So wie 80 Prozent aller Patienten. „Ich habe mit meinem Therapeuten ein so gutes Vertrauensverhältnis, dass ich auch das problemlos mit ihm besprechen kann und er mich gut berät.“
Kostenexplosion. Was Gesundheitsökonomen Gänsehaut bereitet, sind die enormen Preise, die für die neuen Krebspräparate verlangt werden. Die Kosten der Chemotherapie für die im Vorjahr österreichweit angefallenen 91.000 stationären Krebstherapien beliefen sich zusammen auf 70 Millionen Euro. „Die neuen Mittel“, sagt Onkologe Ludwig, „werden die Preisspirale aber noch einmal explosionsartig in die Höhe treiben.“ Das Merck-Medikament Cetuximab, einer der neuesten Hoffnungsträger bei Darmkrebs, kommt etwa pro Einnahmezyklus auf rund 2000 Euro. Bis zu zehn Zyklen sind die Regel. „Und das ist nun überhaupt die Katastrophe in der Krebstherapie“, so Ludwig. „Denn dieses Mittel haben wir zwar, es hilft auch gut und ist behördlich zugelassen. Allerdings weigern sich die Kassen bisher standhaft, es zu bezahlen.“
Ähnliche Signale gibt es bereits bei der neuen Generation der Hormonpräparate zur Brustkrebstherapie, den Aromatasehemmern. Sie sind um ein Vielfaches teurer als Tamoxifen, das derzeitige Mittel der Wahl. „Doch wir sehen bei den neuen Medikamenten in einer großen, derzeit laufenden Studie wirklich sensationelle Zwischenergebnisse“, sagt Samonigg.
Doch auch hier mahnt der Münchener Epidemiologe Hölzel zur Mäßigung. Er findet es höchst bedenklich, die Patienten von einer Therapie zur nächsten zu hetzen. „Solche Empfehlungen“, sagt Hölzel, „können dazu führen, dass die Patienten und ihre Angehörigen nie zur Ruhe kommen und mit Aktionismus und aufwändiger Diagnostik bis wenige Tage vor ihrem Tod noch der erhofften Heilung als Restchance nachjagen.“
Als u naar de bron Der Spiegel gaat kunt u het volledige artikel met statistieken enz. downloaden voor 2 Euro. Misschien dat oncologen toch eens wat bescheidener worden als ze dit artikel lezen.
Der Wunsch nach Heilung
Der berühmte Biochemiker Erwin Chargaff, zog eine deprimierende Bilanz: "Bei der Krebsbekämpfung ist viel herausgekommen, dicke Arbeiten, schöne Preise und Medaillen. Nur, wo die Kranken sterben, ist fast nichts herausgekommen." Die Volkskrankheit Krebs ist nach wie vor unbesiegt.
Nach wie vor gibt es Mängel bei der Früherkennung von Tumoren, falsche Heilversprechungen und Ärzte, die quälen, statt zu helfen. Die Behandlung der Krankheit erfolgt zu selten in speziellen Krebskliniken. Von den drei Behandlungsarten bei Krebs bringt die Chemotherapie letztlich die enttäuschendsten Ergebnisse. Bereits 1987 beschrieb der SPIEGEL im Rahmen einer Titel-Geschichte erste Zweifel am Nutzen der Chemotherapie.
GVAX: Vaccin - een GVAX-vaccin - tegen alvleesklierkanker en reagerend op de molecuul mesothelin geeft hoop in fase I trial bij 14 patiënten.
27 augustus: Bron Dow: Een vaccin uit de GVAX groep van Cellgenesys tegen alvleesklierkanker geeft hoop aldus resultaten uit een fase I trial. 14 patiënten kregen dit vaccin na de reguliere behandelingen als operatie en chemo c.q. bestraling. Alle patiënten hadden door aanwezigheid van uitgezaaide kankercellen in de lymfeklieren en bloed een sterk verhoogd risico op een recidief. Drie patiënten bleven kankervrij voor een periode nu al van 6,5 jaar en tonen alle drie in hun bloed sterke groei van specifieke T-immuuncellen. In 2005 worden de resultaten verwacht van een fase II trial bij 60 patiënten. Voor OPS-leden hebben we het adres van een contactpersoon bij Cellgenesys beschikbaar. Hier het persbericht via de DOW verkregen.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., Aug. 19 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Cell Genesys,
Inc. (Nasdaq: CEGE) today announced the publication of encouraging immunologic
data for GVAX(R) pancreatic cancer vaccine, a non patient-specific vaccine which
is being developed as an "off-the-shelf" pharmaceutical product. In a previously
reported Phase 1 trial of this product, 14 patients received the vaccine after
pancreatic cancer surgery and standard adjuvant therapy. Three patients remain
alive and disease-free at their most recent follow-up of at least 6.5 years.
The newly published article describes a detailed analysis of the immune response
to the vaccine product in these patients. Of particular note is that all three
long-term survivors demonstrated strong T cell responses to mesothelin, a
tumor-associated molecule found on GVAX(R) pancreatic cancer vaccine cells, and
that the specificity of the T cell response to mesothelin was unique to each
responding patient. In contrast, only one of the 11 patients who progressed and
died from pancreatic cancer mounted a detectable immune response to mesothelin
and the level of response in this patient was minimal by comparison. These
findings provide evidence that patient-specific immune responses can be
generated following vaccination with a non patient-specific GVAX(R) cancer
vaccine product and that such responses may correlate with clinical outcome.
The results were published in an August issue of the Journal of Experimental
Medicine by Elizabeth Jaffee, M.D., professor of Oncology, and colleagues at the
Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center.
"These newly published results provide compelling evidence in humans that a
non patient-specific GVAX(R) vaccine product can be used to generate antitumor
immunity, with a profile specific to each vaccinated patient," said Joseph J.
Vallner, Ph.D., president and chief operating officer of Cell Genesys. "Such
findings are important because they provide further scientific proof-of-concept
for our GVAX cancer vaccine strategy, which is focused on non patient-specific,
"off-the-shelf" products. For example, our GVAX(R) prostate cancer vaccine,
which is currently in Phase 3 clinical trials, is a non patient-specific vaccine
product."
The initial Phase 1 trial of GVAX(R) pancreatic cancer vaccine was conducted
at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center in 14 patients who received the
vaccine following surgical resection of their tumor and standard adjuvant
radiation and chemotherapy. As first reported in the Journal of Clinical
Oncology in January 2001, three of eight patients who received the higher dose
levels of the vaccine had prolonged disease-free survival and this continues to
be true at their most recent follow-up of at least 6.5 years. This outcome is
considered particularly significant since all three long-term survivors were
judged to be at high risk for recurrent cancer due to microscopic evidence of
pancreatic tumor following surgery and/or metastatic tumor in pancreatic lymph
nodes. In addition, the three patients with prolonged disease-free survival had
biopsy-proven vaccine-induced antitumor immunity as well as delayed type
sensitivity (DTH) reactions against their own tumor cells, findings not seen in
the patients whose cancer progressed. This observed relationship between
evidence of an immune response to the vaccine and clinical outcome is further
supported by T cell responses to mesothelin described in the Journal of
Experimental Medicine article. As with other GVAX(R) clinical trials, vaccine
treatment was generally well tolerated.
A follow-on Phase 2 clinical trial of GVAX(R) pancreatic cancer vaccine in
patients with operable pancreatic cancer who receive the vaccine after surgical
resection of tumor and adjuvant radiation chemotherapy is currently being
conducted at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center. To date, the study has
enrolled approximately 50 out of a projected 60 patients. Enrollment is
expected to be completed this year, in which case preliminary data may be
available during 2005.
Clinical trials of GVAX(R) cancer vaccines are under way for multiple types
of cancer in addition to pancreatic cancer, including prostate cancer, lung
cancer, leukemia and myeloma. GVAX(R) vaccines are whole-cell vaccines that are
designed to stimulate an immune response against the patient's tumor. The
vaccines are comprised of tumor cells that have been genetically modified to
secrete GM-CSF, an immune stimulatory hormone that plays a key role in
stimulating the body's immune response to vaccines. Currently, Cell Genesys is
developing non patient-specific, "off-the-shelf" GVAX(R) vaccines for prostate
cancer, pancreatic cancer, leukemia and myeloma, and a patient-specific,
individualized vaccine for lung cancer. GVAX(R) cancer vaccines have
demonstrated a favorable side effect profile in over 600 patients treated in
clinical trials to date.
Cell Genesys is focused on the development and commercialization of novel
biological therapies for patients with cancer. The company is pursuing three
cancer product platforms -- GVAX(R) cancer vaccines, oncolytic virus therapies
and antiangiogenesis therapies. Clinical trials of GVAX(R) cancer vaccines
include an ongoing Phase 3 trial of GVAX(R) prostate cancer vaccine as well as
trials of GVAX(R) vaccines for lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, leukemia and
myeloma. Clinical programs of oncolytic virus therapies include CG7870 for
prostate cancer. Preclinical studies are in progress for additional GVAX(R)
cancer vaccines, oncolytic virus therapies and antiangiogenesis therapies for
multiple types of cancer. Cell Genesys' minority-owned subsidiary, Ceregene,
Inc., is focused on gene therapies for neurologic disorders. Cell Genesys also
continues to hold an equity interest in its former subsidiary, Abgenix, Inc., an
antibody products company. Cell Genesys is headquartered in South San
Francisco, CA and has manufacturing operations in San Diego, CA, Hayward, CA and
Memphis, TN. For additional information, please visit the company's website.
Irinotecan plus Gemcitabine geeft tegenover alleen irinotecan geen verschil bij gevorderde niet-kleincellige longkanker in overleving en tijd tot recidief, wel iets minder bijwerkingen,maar ook deze waren niet significant
7 augustus 2004:
Bron: British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 482-488.
doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602010 Published online 6 July 2004
Een gerandomiserde zogeheten multicenter fase II studie, over meerdere ziekenhuizen, wijst uit dat toevoeging van gemzar - gemcitabine naast irinotecan bij gevorderde niet-kleincellige longkankerpatiënten geen enkel effect heeft op de overlevingstijd of op de tijd tot volgende recidief. Wel bleken er wel wat minder bijwerkingen te worden gezien, maar deze verschillen waren niet significant. Onderstaand abstract van studie is gepubliceerd in British Journal of Cancer 6 juli 2004.
Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study
V Georgoulias1, C Kouroussis1, A Agelidou2, I Boukovinas3, P Palamidas4, E Stavrinidis5, A Polyzos6, K Syrigos7, M Veslemes8, M Toubis9, A Ardavanis5, E Tselepatiotis10, I Vlachonikolis11 and for the Lung Cancer Committee of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)
1Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Greece
2First Department of Pulmonary Diseases, 'Sismanoglion' General Hospital, Greece
3Second Department of Medical Oncology, 'Theagenion' Anticancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
4Second Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Sismanoglion' General Hospital of Athens, Greece
5First Department of Medical Oncology, 'Agios Savvas' Anticancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
6Oncology Unit, Department of Propedeutic Medicine, University of Athens, Greece
7Medical Oncology Unit, Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Athens, Greece
8Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Athens, Greece
9Eight Department of Pulmonary Diseases, 'Sotiria' Hospital of Athens, Greece
10Department of Internal Medicine, 'Patision' General Hospital of Athens, Greece
11Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Greece
Correspondence to: Dr V Georgoulias, Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, PO Box 1352, Heraklion, Crete 711 10, Greece. E-mail: georgoul@med.uoc.gr
A preliminary analysis of this trial has been presented at the 38th Annual ASCO Meeting, 18-21 May 2002, Orlando, USA (abstract 1212).
Received 11 December 2003; revised 17 May 2004; accepted 21 May 2004; published online 6 July 2004
To compare irinotecan (CPT-11)+gemcitabine vs CPT-11 alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after docetaxel-cisplatinum-based therapy. A total of 147 evaluable, pretreated patients, with NSCLC, received either gemcitabine (1000 mg m-2, days 1 and 8)+CPT-11 (300 mg m-2, day 8) (Group A, n=76) or CPT-11 (300 mg m-2, day 1) (Group B, n=71), every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 18.4% (95% CI: 9.71-27.14%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 0-8.90%) (P=0.009) for groups A and B, respectively. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of the median duration of response, time to tumour progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed. The CPT-11/gemcitabine regimen significantly improved the patients' quality of life ('general mood today' (P=0.014), 'coughing' (P=0.003) and 'intensity of symptoms' (P=0.034)) compared with CPT-11. More cycles had to be delayed (P=0.001) and required prophylactic growth factor support (P=0.001) in Group A than B. Three (3.9%) patients in Group A and eight (11.3%) in Group B developed febrile neutropenia (P=0.09); one patient died of sepsis in each group. Three additional (Group A, n=1; Group B, n=2) treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3-4 haematologic toxicity was comparable in the two groups except anaemia (P=0.03 in favour of CPT-11). Other nonhaematologic toxicities were mild and similar in the two groups. CPT-11+gemcitabine resulted in a higher response rate and better control of disease-related symptoms than CPT-11 alone, but without any improvement in the overall survival.
Tamoxifen en bestraling: Aanpak van borstkanker na operatie met tamoxifen en bestraling bij vrouwen ouder dan 70 jaar lijkt zinloos. Voor vrouwen vanaf 50 jaar lijkt deze aanpak wel zinvol voor lokale uitzaaiïngen, al is ook hier geen verschil in krijgen van uitzaaiingen op afstand en op overleven tussen beide groepen, blijkt uit recent gepubliceerde gerandomiseerde studies.
9 september 2004: Bron: Pubmed: N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):971-7.
Gerandomiseerde studies hebben uitgewezen dat voor vrouwen met borstkanker boven de 70 jaar operatie en tamoxifen net zo effectief is als operatie en bestraling en tamoxifen en daarmee lijkt extra bestraling geen enkel postief effect te geven bij vrouwen ouder dan 70 jaar. Een andere gerandomiseerde studie laat door deze aanpak bij vrouwen boven de 50 jaar wel een significant positief effect zien op lokaal recidief. Extra bestraling geeft uiteraard veel meer bijwerkingen en is intensiever voor de patiënt.
In de studie bij vrouwen boven de 70 jaar die vijf jaar liep is geen verschil geconstateerd tussen de twee groepen. In de studie bij vrouwen vanaf 50 jaar blijkt het verschil significant beter op het wel of niet krijgen van lokale uitzaaiingen. In beide studies is overigens geen sprake van verschil in wel of niet krijgen van uitzaaiingen op afstand en geen verschil in overleven. Ook in de studie bij vrouwen vanaf 50 jaar was er dus geen verschil in borstkanker overleven tussen vrouwen die wel en vrouwen die niet extra werden bestraald. Overigens hebben verschillende studies bewezen dat andere hormoonkuren beter en efectiever zijn dan Tamoxifen. Zie meer informatie daarover onder kankersoorten-borstkanker. Wellicht is met goede voeding en bepaalde extra vitamines en mineralen en anti-oxidanten het effect van deze behandelingen wel te verbeteren, maar daarvoor zult u een consult moeten doen bij een goed gekwalificeerde orthomoleculaire arts. Zo heeft bv. een studie uitgewezen dat GLA, zit veel in teunisbloemolie als aanvulling het effect van bestralen lijkt te vergroten en de bijwerkingen aanzienlijk te verminderen. Lees studie verslag van GLA onder tamoxifen
Hier de abstracts van beide studies uit Pubmed gehaald en gepubliceerd met toelichting enz. in New England Journal of Medicin september 2004.
Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer.
Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Berry D, Cirrincione C, McCormick B, Shank B, Wheeler J, Champion LA, Smith TJ, Smith BL, Shapiro C, Muss HB, Winer E, Hudis C, Wood W, Sugarbaker D, Henderson IC, Norton L; Cancer and Leukemia Group B; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center, Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genetics and Risk Assessment Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Surgical Oncology, Boston 02114, USA. kshughes@partners.org
BACKGROUND: In women 70 years of age or older who have early breast cancer, it is unclear whether lumpectomy plus tamoxifen is as effective as lumpectomy followed by tamoxifen plus radiation therapy.
METHODS: Between July 1994 and February 1999, we randomly assigned 636 women who were 70 years of age or older and who had clinical stage I (T1N0M0 according to the tumor-node-metastasis classification), estrogen-receptor-positive breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy to receive tamoxifen plus radiation therapy (317 women) or tamoxifen alone (319 women). Primary end points were the time to local or regional recurrence, the frequency of mastectomy for recurrence, breast-cancer-specific survival, the time to distant metastasis, and overall survival.
RESULTS: The only significant difference between the two groups was in the rate of local or regional recurrence at five years (1 percent in the group given tamoxifen plus irradiation and 4 percent in the group given tamoxifen alone, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the rates of mastectomy for local recurrence, distant metastases, or five-year rates of overall survival (87 percent in the group given tamoxifen plus irradiation and 86 percent in the tamoxifen group, P=0.94). Assessment by physicians and patients of cosmetic results and adverse events uniformly rated tamoxifen plus irradiation inferior to tamoxifen alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Lumpectomy plus adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen alone is a realistic choice for the treatment of women 70 years of age or older who have early, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
Bron: Pubmed: N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):963-70.
Tamoxifen with or without breast irradiation in women 50 years of age or older with early breast cancer.>br>
Fyles AW, McCready DR, Manchul LA, Trudeau ME, Merante P, Pintilie M, Weir LM, Olivotto IA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital,, Toronto, ON, Canada. kankersoorten-borstkanker. Opvallend is wel dat deze studie al uitgevoerd is van 1987 tot 1992 en pas in 2003 is gepubliceerd. Wat voor belangen zouden hier nu weer achter zitten. Hieronder het abstract van de studie.
Tamoxifen alone versus adjuvant tamoxifen for operable breast cancer of the elderly: long-term results of the phase III randomized controlled multicenter GRETA trial.
Mustacchi G, Ceccherini R, Milani S, Pluchinotta A, De Matteis A, Maiorino L, Farris A, Scanni A, Sasso F; Italian Cooperative Group GRETA.
Oncology Center, University of Trieste, Napoli, Italy. mustacchi@fmc.univ.trieste.it
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of tamoxifen as primary treatment in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer versus surgery followed by adjuvant tamoxifen.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients randomly received tamoxifen alone (160 mg day 1, then 20 mg/day) for 5 years or surgery followed by tamoxifen (20 mg/day) for 5 years. Overall survival was the main study end point; secondary objectives included breast cancer survival and local control of the disease.
RESULTS: Between 1987 and 1992, 239 patients were assigned to surgery plus tamoxifen and 235 to tamoxifen alone. Treatment arms were comparable for tumor size, clinical nodal status and performance status. At a median follow-up of 80 months 274 patients had died. No difference between groups had emerged in overall and breast cancer survival. There were 27 local progressions in the surgery plus tamoxifen group and 106 in the tamoxifen-alone group (P = 0.0001). In the surgery plus tamoxifen group, no difference in overall survival had emerged according to the extension of operation.
CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of the study confirm the 3-year interim analysis already reported. Surgery (radical or minimal) followed by adjuvant tamoxifen does not modify overall and breast cancer survival as compared with tamoxifen alone in early breast cancer of older women. Because of the high rate of local progressions with tamoxifen alone, minimal surgery followed by tamoxifen appears to be the appropriate treatment in such patients. More extensive surgery is not useful. Tamoxifen alone is an adequate alternative treatment in very old or frail patients.
Uracil-tagafur (UFT) vergroot kans op vijfsjaaroverleving van 74% naar 85% bij niet-kleincellige longkankerpatiënten na operatie.
Uracil-tegafur (UFT) vergroot kans op vijfjaarsoverleving bij longkankerpatiënten met niet-kleincellige kankercellen van 74% naar 85%.
d.d. 25 april 2004:
Bron: CNN, onderstaande artikel vrij vertaald met hulp van een freetranslater.
Uracil-tegafur (UFT) een chemo in pilvorm vergroot kans op vijfjaarsoverleving van 74% naar 85% bij longkankerpatiënten met niet-kleincellige kankercellen na operatie, aldus Japanse onderzoekers.
Een Japanse studie heeft gevonden/bewezen dat een drugscombinatie die als een kanker behandeling bij darmkanker in de Verenigde Staten is afgekeurd jaren kan toevoegen aan het leven van mensen met longkanker zonder uitzaaiingen buiten de longen.
Longkanker is een van de meest voorkomende en dodelijkste soort kanker en 85 procent sterft aan longkanker. Enkel een andere chemo, cisplatin, kan de overlevingstijd in vroege stadiums van longkanker verbeteren en het voegt enkel maanden toe aan de levensverwachting.
"Dit is een grote verrassing voor Amerikaanse oncologen," zegt Dr. Herman Kattlove of Los Angeles, medical editor for the American Cancer Society.
Bovendien de twee-drugscombinatie, genaamd uracil-tegafur of UFT, is een pil, in plaats van iets dat in een ader ingebracht moet worden en bovendien heeft UFT weinig neveneffecten/bijwerkingen, zoals Dr. Yukito Ichinose and others verbonden aan Japanse ziekenhuizen rapporteerden in de New England Journal of Medicine.
Nochtans, zou UFT schijnbaar nuttig zijn voor een klein percentage van de 174,000 mensen gediagnosticeerd met long kanker in de Verenigde Staten elk jaar -- minder dan 10.000, ruwwweg geschat. UFT werkt alleen tegen adenomas, ook wel niet--kleine-celkanker genoemd en enkel bij patiënten met kleine tumoren die zich nog niet buiten de longen verspreid hebben.
Overlevingsbijzonderheden: De Japanse onderzoekers keken naar 979 patiënten. Bij alle patiënten waren via chirurgie de tumoren verwijderd. De helft -- 482 -- kreeg ook de pillen Uracil-tegafur (UFT), die tweemaal per dag gedurende twee jaren werden genomen.
Na vijf jaar was er geen verschil in lichameljke conditie en tumrogroei onder de 412 patiënten met de kleinste tumors, die minder dan acht-tiende van een inch waren (ca. 2 cm. doorsnee).
Maar patiënten met grotere tumoren bleken langer met deze chemo UFT te leven. Na vijf jaar was 85 procent van de UFT patiënten met tumoren groter dan 2,5 cm. nog steeds in leven, tegen 74 procenten van degenen die geen aanvullende chemotherapie kregen.
Het resultaatsverschil op overleven na vijf jaar voor mensen met tumoren die kleiner waren dan 2,5 cm. doorsnee was niet significant: 89 procent van de UFT patiënten tegen 86 procenten van de vergelijkingsgroep.
"Hoe gevorderder uw kanker hoe waarschijnljker het is dat u eraan sterft , maar hoe beter zal een behandeling u helpen," zegt Kattlove.
De Uracil-tegafur (UFT) werd voor longkanker in de Verenigde Staten niet in trials getest. Bristol Myers Squibb and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. onderzochten in trials UFT tegen uitgezaaide darmkanker, maar de FDA weigerde hun onderzoeksresultaten toestemming te geven. UFT wordt wel in Azië, Europa, en Latijns-Amerika gegeven.
Kathy Baum, een woordvoerster voor farmaceutisch bedrijf Bristol Myers Squibb, wilde niet zeggen of deze nieuwe vondsten een nieuwe toepassing voor UFT als een longkanker behandeling zou stimuleren.
Kattlove zegt dat de meeste oncologen meer studies willen zien. "Het vinden van een medicijn dat zo eenvoudig kan worden toegediend, en bijna zonder neveneffecten werkt, is eenvoudig te goed om juist te zijn," zegt hij.
Dr. Alfred Munzer, voorbije president van de American Lung Association zegt dat het medicijn aan patiënten die de beste kansen hebben enige hoop zou kunnen geven ermee te beginnen.
", Maar de boodschap voor longkanker is nog steeds dat preventie veel belangrijker is dan behandeling en veel doeltreffender," zegt hij. "Dat wil zeggen stoppen met roken."
d.d. 25 april 2004:
Hieronder het CNN bericht dat hierboven is vertaald:
(AP) -- Surprising U.S. experts, a Japanese study has found that a drug combination rejected as a cancer treatment in the United States can add years to the lives of people with early lung cancer.
Lung cancer is one of the most common and lethal types of cancer, killing 85 percent of its sufferers. Only one other drug, cisplatin, has been shown to improve survival in early stages, and it adds only months.
"This is a big surprise to American oncologists," said Dr. Herman Kattlove of Los Angeles, medical editor for the American Cancer Society.
In addition, the two-drug combination, called uracil-tegafur, or UFT, is a pill, rather than something which must be dripped into a vein, and it has few side effects, Dr. Yukito Ichinose and others at hospitals around Japan reported in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.
However, UFT apparently would be useful for only a small percentage of the 174,000 people diagnosed with lung cancer each year in the United States -- as few as 10,000, by some estimates. It works only against adenomas, also called non-small-cell cancers, and only among patients with small tumors that have not spread out of the lung.
Survival specifics
The Japanese researchers looked at 979 such patients. All had surgery to remove the tumor. Half -- 482 -- also got the pills, which were taken twice a day for two years.
After five years, there was no difference among the 412 patients with the smallest tumors, those less than eight-tenths of an inch across.
But patients with larger tumors were more likely to live longer with the drug. After five years, 85 percent of the UFT patients with tumors more than 1.2 inches across were still alive, versus 74 percent of those who got no chemotherapy.
The effect on survival after five years was much less marked for people with tumors in between those two sizes: Eighty-nine percent of the UFT patients versus 86 percent of the comparison group.
"The more advanced the cancer the more likely it is to kill you, so the more likely a treatment is to help you," Kattlove said.
Uracil-tegafur was not tested for lung cancer in the United States. Bristol Myers Squibb and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. did test it against colon cancer, but the Food and Drug Administration rejected their application for approval. However, it is used in Asia, Europe, and Latin America.
Kathy Baum, a spokeswoman for drug-maker Bristol Myers Squibb, would not say whether the findings would prompt a new application for UFT as a lung cancer treatment.
Kattlove said most cancer doctors would want to see more studies. "Finding a drug as simple as this, as free of side effects, that works is just too good to be true," he said.
Dr. Alfred Munzer, past president of the American Lung Association, said the drug could offer some hope to patients who have the best chances to start with.
"But the message for lung cancer still is that prevention is far more important than cure, and far more effective," he said. "That's, of course, to stop smoking."
Uracil-tegafur (UFT) geeft zelfde resultaat bij uitgezaaide darmkanker als intraveneuze chemo (5-FU en leucovorin) maar veel minder bijwerkingen en veel gemakkelijker in te nemen
Uracil-tegafur (UFT) geeft zelfde resultaat bij uitgezaaide darmkanker als intraveneuze chemo (5-FU en leucovorin) maar veel minder bijwerkingen en veel gemakkelijker in te nemen
d.d. 25 april 2004: Bron: Pubmed, J Clin Oncol. 2002 Sep 1;20(17):3605-16
.
Onderstaande dubbelblinde gerandomiseerde studie suggereert en bewijst dat Uracil-tagafur (UFT) in vergelijking met 5-FU en leucorin een even goed resultaat geeft bij uitgezaaide darmkanker maar met veel minder bijwerkingen en veel gemakkelijker in te nemen. Wie op internet zoekt ziet dat deze oral chemo in tabletvorm net als Xeloda bv. bij veel verschillende vaste tumoren nu wordt uitgeprobeerd in fase II en fase III trials. Een interessante ontwikkeling.
Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Douillard JY, Hoff PM, Skillings JR, Eisenberg P, Davidson N, Harper P, Vincent MD, Lembersky BC, Thompson S, Maniero A, Benner SE.
Centre Rene Gauducheau, Nantes, France. jy-douillard@nantes.fnclcc.fr
PURPOSE: This phase III study was designed to demonstrate equivalence in survival of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and oral leucovorin (LV) to conventional intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (5-FU) and LV in previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Safety was also compared.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred sixteen patients were randomized to receive either UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (75 or 90 mg/d) for 28 days every 35 days or IV bolus 5-FU (425 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (20 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 days every 28 days.
RESULTS: UFT/LV produced survival comparable to the IV 5-FU/LV regimen. Median survival was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.2 to 13.6 months) with UFT/LV and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 15.4 months) with 5-FU/LV (P =.630). The hazard ratio for survival was 0.964 (95.6% CI, 0.826 to 1.125), supporting equivalent survival. The overall response rate did not differ between treatment arms (UFT/LV, 11.7%; 5-FU/LV, 14.5%; P =.232). Median time to progression favored 5-FU/LV (UFT/LV, 3.5 months; 5-FU/LV, 3.8 months; P =.011), but tumor assessment schedules differed between arms. UFT/LV significantly improved safety compared with 5-FU/LV. Diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, and stomatitis and mucositis were significantly less frequent with UFT/LV, as was myelosuppression. Patients treated with UFT/LV had fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia (P <.001) and documented infections (P <.05). Increased bilirubin, without other liver function abnormalities, was observed more often with UFT/LV (P <.001). Concomitant medications were more frequent with 5-FU/LV, including use of antibiotics, growth factors, and antiemetics.
CONCLUSION: UFT/LV provided a safer, more convenient oral alternative to a standard bolus IV 5-FU/LV regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer while producing equivalent survival.
Virus als medicijn: MediGene start Phase I/II Trial met inbreng van kankerdodend virus bij niet te opereren leveruitzaaiïngen onder de naam NV1020, een herpes simplex virus.
3 september 2004: Bron -- Persbericht van Medigene
Na alle mooie nieuws over bv. het Newcastle virus en inbreng van virus door engelse onderzoekers, zie elders onder deze artikelen onder actueel regulier onderzoek, een mooi nieuw initiatief met inbrengen van een kankerdodend virus. Deze week maakte het Amerikaans-Duitse farmaceutisch bedrijf Medigene bekend dat zij een fase I - II trial starten om het effect te testen van het inbrengen van een kankerdodend virus, een herpes simplex virus, in niet operabele tumoren in de lever van darmkankerpatiënten met het adenocarcinoom. Het kankerdodende virus wordt onder de codenaam NV1020 getest. Allereerst op effect, tolerantie en veiligheid. Er wordt zowel getest met het virus alleen als wel in combinatie met chemo bij ca. 30 patienten in 7 verschillende ziekenhuizen in de USA. De patiënten krijgen vier keer het virus teogeeind en daarna nog een chemokuur erachteraan. De uitslagen van deze trial worden medio 2006 verwacht.
MediGene Initiates Clinical Phase I/II Trial of Cancer-Killing Virus NV1020 for the Treatment of Liver Metastases.
MARTINSRIED, Germany and SAN DIEGO, Sept. 2 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ --
Today the German-American biotech company MediGene AG (Frankfurt, Prime Standard: MDG) announced the initiation of a clinical phase I/II trial of the drug candidate NV1020 for the treatment of liver metastases developing from colorectal cancer. NV1020 is currently developed as a cancer-killing
(oncolytic) virus. It is a herpes simplex virus, genetically modified for the specific destruction of tumor cells without harming healthy tissue. The trial will evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of NV1020 as well as its synergies with chemotherapy. In this trial, about 30 patients will be treated in up to 7 clinical centres in the USA. The positive results obtained in a clinical phase I trial of NV1020 form the basis for this trial. MediGene expects the results of the phase I/II study by mid 2006. The sales potential for NV1020 is estimated at over 200 million Euros, provided that the three- step clinical development is successful and marketing authorization is granted.
Dr. Peter Heinrich, Chief Executive Officer of MediGene AG, comments: "Cancer-killing viruses like NV1020 are among the most innovative products of today's drug development. If the development of NV1020 proceeds as successfully in the future as it has up to now, MediGene may become the first
company wordwide to develop a virus mutant cancer drug to market maturity. This could be a very valuable contribution to improvement in cancer therapy."
NV1020: MediGene's oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV) NV1020 is designed to selectively multiply in tumor cells, thus destroying the tumor (oncolysis). The technology is based on the assumption that oncolytic HSV act more selectively and efficiently than conventional cancer therapies, without leading to severe adverse events. They could provide a therapeutic alternative against tumors that are inoperable or have developed a resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. There may be also a synergistic effect of combining oncolytic HSV and standard therapies such as chemotherapy.
Study design: The trial will be composed of a part to determine the appropriate dosage, followed by a phase 2 part investigating tolerability and efficacy utilizing the optimal dose of NV1020. The patients participating in the trial suffer from colorectal adenocarcinoma which cannot be removed by surgery. In the course of the trial, NV1020 is administered to these patients four times, followed by standard chemotherapy. The first study center has been initiated and the first patient has been evaluated for study eligibility.
This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained herein represent the judgement of MediGene as of the date of this release. These forward- looking statements are no guarantees for future performance, and the forward-
looking events discussed in this press release may not occur. MediGene disclaims any intent or obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements.
MediGene(TM) is a trademark of MediGene AG.
About MediGene: MediGene AG is a publicly quoted (Frankfurt: Prime Standard), German-
American biotechnology company located in Martinsried, Germany and San Diego, USA. MediGene is the first German biotech company with a drug on the market. The company has the most mature drug development pipeline in the German biotech industry (drug candidates undergoing clinical phase I - III trials). In addition, MediGene possesses innovative platform technologies with its HSV technology and the newly acquired EndoTAG(TM) technology. MediGene's core competence lies in research and development of novel approaches for the treatment of various tumor diseases. Thus MediGene focuses on indications of high medical need and economic opportunities.
SOURCE MediGene AG /CONTACT: Julia Hofmann, Public Relations, +49-89-85-65-3324, or Dr. Michael Nettersheim, Investor Relations, +49-89-85-65-2946, both of MediGene AG, fax, +49-89-85-65-2920, or investor@medigene.com
Xeloda - capecitabine geeft 14% beter resultaat in overleving en tijd tot recidief bij darmkankerpatiënten na operatie in vergelijking met 5FU. Xeloda lijkt nu eerste lijns te gaan worden bij darmkankerpatiënten, ook in Europa
24 augustus 2004: Bron: Dow
De orale chemo Xeloda - Capecitabine zorgt in gerandomiseerde fase III trial voor 14% beter resultaat dan 5FU/LV bij darmkanker na operatie. Daarnaast geeft Xeloda veel minder bijwerkingen en is minder ziekenhuisbezoek nodig. Op basis van deze studieresultaten ljikt nu ook in Europa Xeloda - capecitabine als eerste lijns voorgesteld en geaccepteerd te gaan worden bij uitgezaaide darmkanker. Lees hier het persbericht zoals dat vandaag door de DOW werd vrijgegeven. Pikant en ook iets om toch even met trots op terug te kijken, al drie jaar geleden kwamen wij als eerste in Nederland op deze website met aandacht voor Xeloda in vergelijking met 5FU. In het begin moesten patiënten enorm knokken en praten om Xeloda te kunnen krijgen van hun oncoloog, maar nu lijkt het veel minder moeite te kosten. Deze studie en aanvraag tot acceptatie als eerste lijns bevestigt dat we toen al terecht hier aandacht aan hebben besteed. Als u dan ook nog eens gezond erbij eet en bepaalde voedingsuppletie gebruikt kan dat een enorme verbetering en misschien zelfs wel volledige genezing van uw darmkanker betekenen. In ieder geval lijkt de kwaliteit van leven met sprongen vooruit te gaan door de combinatie Xeloda en extra dieet zoals bv. Moermandieet en bepaalde extra voedimgsuppletie. Wacht nu eens niet tot u echt ongeneeslijk wordt verklaard of een recidief krijgt. Bij darmkanker is juist die periode na operatie zo ontzettend belangrijk. besteed aandacht aan uw eten en leefstijl. Echt het is de moeite waard. Overigens lijkt Xeloda - capecitabine ook zeer interessant voor borstkankerpatiënten na operatie.
-- DJ Roche Files Additional Xeloda Indication In Europe, US --
Edited Press Release
BASEL (Dow Jones)--Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche Holding AG (RHHBY) said
Tuesday it has has filed an additional indication in Europe and the U.S. for its
cancer drug Xeloda to treat colon cancer patients after surgery
Adjuvant therapy, or after surgery therpay, is one of the most common
treatment approaches in colon cancer patients.
The submission to the European and the U.S. regulatory authorities is based on
results from the successful X-ACT trial (Xeloda in Adjuvant Colon Cancer
Therapy) which demonstrated that Xeloda, an oral chemotherapy treatment, could
replace commonly used intravenous 5-FU/LV based therapy.
William M. Burns, Head of Roche's Pharmaceuticals Division said, "Our
endeavour is to constantly improve treatment options in cancer. We are therefore
pleased to be able to work with the regulatory authorities to also improve the
therapy of patients with early stage colon cancer, encouraged by the outstanding
results of the X-ACT study."
The global study involved almost 2,000 patients and has first been presented
at this year's American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference in New
Orleans. The X-ACT trial successfully met its primary endpoint of demonstrating
at least equivalent disease free survival compared to intravenous 5-FU/LV.
Moreover, it proved that Xeloda reduced the risk of tumours coming back
(relapse-free survival) by an impressive 14%. This means that, each year, if
treated with Xeloda, nearly 4,000 additional colon cancer patients worldwide
would not suffer a recurrence of their cancer.
As further presented at ASCO, Xeloda also saved medical resources compared to
intravenous chemotherapy. On average, a patient only needed about 8 hospital
visits if treated with Xeloda compared to about 30 visits if treated with
intravenous chemotherapy and Xeloda treatment resulted in fewer drug costs to
treat chemotherapy side effects. Roche will present a full pharmacoeconomic
analysis of Xeloda at this years European Society of Medical Oncology congress
in Vienna, Austria.
The lead investigator Professor Jim Cassidy concluded his oral presentation at
ASCO by stating: "Capecitabine (Xeloda) should replace 5-FU/LV in adjuvant
treatment of colon cancer". Professor Cassidy is the Cancer Research UK
Professor of Oncology and Chair of Medical Oncology, Beatson Oncology Centre, at
the University of Glasgow in Scotland.
The results of the X-ACT trial further support the ongoing and planned
adjuvant studies of Xeloda in combination with other chemotherapies and targeted
therapy such as Avastin, enrolling over 6000 patients on a global level.
Company Web Site: www.Roche.com